Re: [fpc-pascal] missing functions in libc

2008-08-21 Thread Marco van de Voort
In our previous episode, Marc Santhoff said: > At first the compiler does not find librt and libdl. I know these exist > only on Linux and don't know, why they are tried to be pulled in. libdl is mostly uses for dynamically loading dynamic libraries. Probably that packages declares its own loadlib

Re: [fpc-pascal] missing functions in libc

2008-08-21 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Marc Santhoff wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile LPTK 0.9.0 on FreeBSD 4 using a working fpc 2.0.4. > I use this compiler for a long time now and never had the symptoms as > following: > > At first the compiler does not find librt and libdl. I know these exist > only o

[fpc-pascal] missing functions in libc

2008-08-21 Thread Marc Santhoff
Hi, I'm trying to compile LPTK 0.9.0 on FreeBSD 4 using a working fpc 2.0.4. I use this compiler for a long time now and never had the symptoms as following: At first the compiler does not find librt and libdl. I know these exist only on Linux and don't know, why they are tried to be pulled in.

Re: [fpc-pascal] compiling on FreeBSD6 or 7 for target FreeBSD4 possible?

2008-08-21 Thread Marc Santhoff
Am Donnerstag, den 21.08.2008, 13:05 +0400 schrieb Boris Samorodov: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:39:55 +0200 Marc Santhoff wrote: > > > for some reason I have to have a compiler creating binaries for FreeBSD > > 4 at hand. > > > Since all computers around here are on the way to FreeBSD 6 or 7 I have

Re: [fpc-pascal] compiling on FreeBSD6 or 7 for target FreeBSD4 possible?

2008-08-21 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:39:55 +0200 Marc Santhoff wrote: > for some reason I have to have a compiler creating binaries for FreeBSD > 4 at hand. > Since all computers around here are on the way to FreeBSD 6 or 7 I have > to decide between having a seperate disk or partition or virtual machine > for