Re: [fpc-pascal] > ARM and graphic libraries

2008-02-24 Thread Paul Nicholls
- Original Message - From: "Weyert de Boer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions" Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 9:40 AM Subject: [fpc-pascal] > ARM and graphic libraries Does anyone here have any experience with using FreePascal using ARM microprocessor and drawin

Re: [fpc-pascal] Vim FileType for pascal files

2008-02-24 Thread Damien Gerard
Le Feb 24, 2008 à 9:59 PM, Lucas Vasconcelos a écrit : hi, try // vim: set ts=4 filetype=pascal : ;~] It does not work either :( On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Damien Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi ! I use includes files and a vim editor. Obviously .inc are not recognized a

Re: [fpc-pascal] Vim FileType for pascal files

2008-02-24 Thread Lucas Vasconcelos
hi, try // vim: set ts=4 filetype=pascal : ;~] On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Damien Gerard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi ! > > I use includes files and a vim editor. Obviously .inc are not > recognized as pascal files. > I tried the following : > // vim:ts=4:filetype=pascal > > bu

Re: [fpc-pascal] Vim FileType for pascal files

2008-02-24 Thread bartek
On Sunday 24 February 2008 13:29:45 Damien Gerard wrote: > > hi ! > > I use includes files and a vim editor. Obviously .inc are not > recognized as pascal files. > I tried the following : > // vim:ts=4:filetype=pascal > > but it does not work. > > Any ideas ? > Hi, its nice to see another u

[fpc-pascal] Vim FileType for pascal files

2008-02-24 Thread Damien Gerard
hi ! I use includes files and a vim editor. Obviously .inc are not recognized as pascal files. I tried the following : // vim:ts=4:filetype=pascal but it does not work. Any ideas ? -- Damien Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED] Le temps n'a pas d'importance. Seul le code est important -- (f00ty)

Re: [fpc-pascal] Empty record inside another record ?

2008-02-24 Thread Daniël Mantione
Op Sun, 24 Feb 2008, schreef Skybuck Flying: Finally there is another question remaining: Are objects always packed ? No, to get packed objects you have to declare them packed. A record and object with the same field list have the same binary layout. Daniël___

Re: [fpc-pascal] Empty record inside another record ?

2008-02-24 Thread Skybuck Flying
Finally there is another question remaining: Are objects always packed ? If not then it could be a problem. Something which records do allow. Bye, Skybuck. - Original Message - From: "Daniël Mantione" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions" Sent: Saturday, February

Re: [fpc-pascal] Empty record inside another record ?

2008-02-24 Thread Skybuck Flying
There is another great limitation of your suggested solution. The offsets for the objects are bound at compile time. While the record solution allows the offsets to be determined at run time. Making the record solution a more flexible solution. In other words objects need to specify their ance