Jakub Marian wrote:
Hello,
I need to save data stored in memory into .bmp or (which would be the better
variant) into .jpg file. Actually what I want to do is to save the OpenGL
screen (probably using glReadPixels() function) into image. I've downloaded
PasJPEG, but it doesn't seem to be working
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:59:17 -0300
"Lucas Vasconcelos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. But, i´m using FPC *only*.
>
> I install Lazarus and try compile my application using FileUtil unit
> but lazarus give me a
> error message: "Can´t find unit FileUtil used by mytest"
>
> What option that i c
Ok. But, i´m using FPC *only*.
I install Lazarus and try compile my application using FileUtil unit
but lazarus give me a
error message: "Can´t find unit FileUtil used by mytest"
What option that i can put C:\lazarus\lcl folder on library (or include) path ??
*sorry for my bad english.
On Feb
Skybuck Flying schrieb:
> For records, I would use an extension field like:
>
> IP.Payload
>
> and
>
> UDP.Payload
>
> I would hardly call that obfuscation :)
Having the same name for different things is always obfuscation.
___
fpc-pascal maillist -
> For records, I would use an extension field like:
>
> IP.Payload
>
> and
>
> UDP.Payload
>
> I would hardly call that obfuscation :)
But the whole idea of inheritance is that child fields and methods are also
available in UDP.
Have a look at a basis OOP tutorial.
_
For records, I would use an extension field like:
IP.Payload
and
UDP.Payload
I would hardly call that obfuscation :)
Bye,
Skybuck.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 19 Feb 2008, at 10:16, Tiziano De Togni wrote:
Vincent Snijders ha scritto:
Tiziano De Togni schreef:
Florian Klaempfl ha scritto:
Skybuck Flying schrieb:
One drawback of objects already discovered:
am I correct?
This is not allowed in {$mode objfpc}, because of the reasons
Florian
Vincent Snijders ha scritto:
Tiziano De Togni schreef:
Florian Klaempfl ha scritto:
Skybuck Flying schrieb:
One drawback of objects already discovered:
am I correct?
This is not allowed in {$mode objfpc}, because of the reasons Florian
memtioned. It is allowed in {$mode delphi}.
Vincen
var
MyObject: TAncestor;
This is the problem.
it compiles correctly in Delphi (5 and 7)
Are you sure? It fails on my Delphi 7.
-Bee-
has Bee.ography at:
http://beeography.wordpress.com
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.or
Tiziano De Togni schreef:
Florian Klaempfl ha scritto:
Skybuck Flying schrieb:
One drawback of objects already discovered:
Objects cannot have the same field identifiers.
Indeed, especially if you want to win an obfuscation contest.
ok, this is true for object type, but it should not be ex
10 matches
Mail list logo
