Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: FCL-DB/SQLDB docs started

2008-02-04 Thread Chris Kirkpatrick
OK - speaking a bit loosely! When trying to untangle database stuff, I need to refer to both Units. Sorry - Chris Michael Van Canneyt wrote: On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Chris Kirkpatrick wrote: Hi Joost - Would you have time to do the same for SQLDb? Otherwise, should I do a MakeSkel and send you

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: FCL-DB/SQLDB docs started

2008-02-04 Thread Joost van der Sluis
Op maandag 04-02-2008 om 09:10 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Chris Kirkpatrick: > Hi Joost - > Would you have time to do the same for SQLDb? Otherwise, should I do a > MakeSkel and send you a zipped file to commit? > I have already started work on Db, but the two units depend heavily upon > each

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: FCL-DB/SQLDB docs started

2008-02-04 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Chris Kirkpatrick wrote: > Hi Joost - > Would you have time to do the same for SQLDb? Otherwise, should I do a > MakeSkel and send you a zipped file to commit? > I have already started work on Db, but the two units depend heavily upon each > other. Strange that you say this.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: FCL-DB/SQLDB docs started

2008-02-04 Thread Chris Kirkpatrick
Hi Joost - Would you have time to do the same for SQLDb? Otherwise, should I do a MakeSkel and send you a zipped file to commit? I have already started work on Db, but the two units depend heavily upon each other. Regards - Chris Joost van der Sluis wrote: Op vrijdag 25-01-2008 om 23:59 uur [