On Wednesday 16 January 2008 17:49, Roberto Padovani wrote:
> Given that I don't have Delphi, suppose that company X ask me to make
> a software for them. I might give them the software, with full source
> code and a GPL licence note every here and there, and ask money for
> the _design_ of the so
On Jan 16, 2008 9:42 PM, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Regardless of this, we do not wish to be suspected of using Borland's
> code, and therefor decided to play it safe and recode the routines
> anyway. I cannot stress this enough.
Are the recoded routines in 2.2.1?
Any vague
Some time ago, I posted about this.
On the TP mode FreePascal can use a function as a procedure. Florian
told me that that was because of the version of the TP emulation.
Well, after that, I was happy with that until now. I discovered that,
even adding {$x-} to the code, if you put a function ins
I was used to wok with freepascal on windows. Now, I have switch to mac (
10.5) and would like to know what are the things that I need to have it
running. If anybody can send me a basic tutorial for installation, running
and so on, I will be delighted.
Thanks,
Eze.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, John Stoneham wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2008 7:18 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not too much implication, for you, normally:
> >
> > 1. If you have a licensed copy of Delphi, you can ignore it:
> >you are allowed to use this source code.
> >
> >(We
John Stoneham schrieb:
>
> Here's an interesting question: Is any of the code at issue also in
> CLX?
Yes. To my knowledge all affected code is GPLed. However the FPC RTL is
modified LGPL which is GPL incompatible in this regard (you might not
change GPL licenses into LPGL ones).
___
On Jan 16, 2008 7:18 AM, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not too much implication, for you, normally:
>
> 1. If you have a licensed copy of Delphi, you can ignore it:
>you are allowed to use this source code.
>
>(We do not have the right to distribute it, but that is our pr
Thanks a lot!
you can't find a lawyer anywhere when you need it! :-) I'm joking, of course...
Given that I don't have Delphi, suppose that company X ask me to make
a software for them. I might give them the software, with full source
code and a GPL licence note every here and there, and ask money
Hello,
the following program is throwing an Access Violation on my system
(ARM920T, uClibc):
program project1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
uses
cthreads, SysUtils;
function TheThread(pAnyArgument: Pointer): Longint;
begin
repeat
Sleep(1000);
until FALSE;
end;
begin
Writeln('Running.
Hi,
2008/1/8, Jeff Pohlmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> David Baldwin's components are very nice, but maybe
> not so portable. I think they used to be closed-source,
> but the only license info I could find on his website
> now says:
>
> "Complete source code is provided. The HTML Display
> Component
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Roberto Padovani wrote:
> I've been following this topic from the beginning and I took the time
> to read the (questionable) blog from the ex-CG developer.
>
> I'm interested in it because aside my personal enjoyment, I started
> using freepascal+lazarus where I work in ord
I've been following this topic from the beginning and I took the time
to read the (questionable) blog from the ex-CG developer.
I'm interested in it because aside my personal enjoyment, I started
using freepascal+lazarus where I work in order to quickly solve some
needs like data analysis, algorit
On 16/01/2008, Tiziano De Togni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could you please tell me if there is a real chance that CodeGear asks
> money for a concrete copyright violation to someone of the FPC or
> Lazarus developers?
FPC developers approached them (CodeGear) and took it on ourselves to
solve
On Jan 16, 2008 3:42 AM, Tiziano De Togni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Could you please tell me if there is a real chance that CodeGear asks
> money for a concrete copyright violation to someone of the FPC or
> Lazarus developers?
>
> And in this case, how this claim could be performed?
Well, one
John Stoneham ha scritto:
apparent that he came to his conclusions as to the copyright issue at
the beginning of last year while still at CodeGear. I think it's
interesting that he never raised those issues then. It is also clear
that he has no clue about copyright law. It seems he believes that
15 matches
Mail list logo
