Re: [fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb: > On Nov 18, 2007 11:10 AM, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> and Windows? >> Windows needs no PIC. > > Isn't PIC the same as relocatable code? No. PIC allows only to map the same physical mem page with program code at different virtual memory l

Re: [fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Nov 18, 2007 11:10 AM, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > and Windows? > > Windows needs no PIC. Isn't PIC the same as relocatable code? Which would be activated by -WR as described on the item 3 here: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/FPC_and_Apache_Modules#Possible_problems I

Re: [fpc-pascal] Converting StrLCopy to widestrings

2007-11-18 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On Nov 18, 2007 2:11 PM, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to review the code in that area, imo it is not needed. I couldn't make it work without allocating. There is no permanent storage for the data available. > anyway when is the allocateed memory freed ? I noticed that it's n

Re: [fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread afpTeam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: Hi, Currently the FAQ shows Position Independent Code generation is "currently broken" in the creation of shared libraries, (Future Plans shows 2.4 working to recover it). I tried to search the web site but the search system gives an error right now. Please, what ver

Re: Re: [fpc-pascal] Linux : Using SDL with GTK2 ?

2007-11-18 Thread T.Guilleminot
Thanks a LOT Andrew ! Your example is very nice ! Tom ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Converting StrLCopy to widestrings

2007-11-18 Thread Marc Weustink
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote: On Nov 17, 2007 1:25 PM, Marc Weustink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: First question, why is the copying needed ? Why isn'tlpStrFile := PWChar(FileNameWide); simply enough ? IMO, you're copying way to much. That variable is only valid on the scope of the fun

Re: [fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:29, Florian Klaempfl wrote: Jonas Maebe schrieb: On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:10, Florian Klaempfl wrote: Please, what version did PIC last work in for Linux PIC works in 2.2.0. Afaik it doesn't. Are there any bug reports? x86-64 is afaik even build with pic. x86_64 m

Re: [fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Jonas Maebe schrieb: > > On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:10, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > >>> Please, what version did PIC last work in for Linux >> >> PIC works in 2.2.0. > > Afaik it doesn't. Are there any bug reports? x86-64 is afaik even build with pic. ___ fp

Re: [fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread Jonas Maebe
On 18 Nov 2007, at 11:10, Florian Klaempfl wrote: Please, what version did PIC last work in for Linux PIC works in 2.2.0. Afaik it doesn't. Jonas ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/lis

Re: [fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread Florian Klaempfl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: > Hi, > > Currently the FAQ shows Position Independent Code generation is > "currently broken" in the creation of shared libraries, (Future Plans > shows 2.4 working to recover it). I tried to search the web site but > the search system gives an error right now. > > Pl

[fpc-pascal] PIC returns in 2.4?

2007-11-18 Thread urbansound
Hi, Currently the FAQ shows Position Independent Code generation is "currently broken" in the creation of shared libraries, (Future Plans shows 2.4 working to recover it). I tried to search the web site but the search system gives an error right now. Please, what version did PIC last work i