> You cannot do this with a single construct; You need a pointer in the case
> of a dynamically loaded library.
> >
> > I'm not sure that I understand. can you please point me to an example ?
He means it depends on whether you are using:
DLL bound dynamically at program runtime
DLL bound statical
Thanks Florian!
2007/10/26, Florian Klaempfl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Paulo Estrela schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was trying to install fpc 2.2.0 on a CentOS 5 x64 machine using rpm
> > package, but libtinfo.so.5 is required. My system doesn`t have this
> > lib and I didn`t find anything on Internet re
Paulo Estrela schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to install fpc 2.2.0 on a CentOS 5 x64 machine using rpm
> package, but libtinfo.so.5 is required. My system doesn`t have this
> lib and I didn`t find anything on Internet related to this. Anyone
> with same problem or any idea?
http://www.freepascal.
Hello,
Now that Mac OS X 10.5 has been (more or less) released, some notes
on issues you may encounter when using FPC 2.2.0 (or earlier) on that
new Mac OS X release. All issues are related to the fact the Apple
now uses a different linker (the old 32 bit linker has been scrapped,
and the
En/na Matt Emson ha escrit:
Does FPC support the flavour of Linux on the N800? That might also be
something I'd like to look at.
No :-(
All packages for the n800 are armel, i.e. they use EABI, while fpc
generates OABI calls.
I don't really know all the details of OABI vs EABI, I only know tha
On 10/25/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, ik wrote:
>
> > On 10/25/07, Marc Santhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 25.10.2007, 11:12 +0200 schrieb ik:
> > > > Hello List,
> > > >
> > > > I'm binding FAM/GAM to Pascal, and I do it in
Hi,
I was trying to install fpc 2.2.0 on a CentOS 5 x64 machine using rpm
package, but libtinfo.so.5 is required. My system doesn`t have this
lib and I didn`t find anything on Internet related to this. Anyone
with same problem or any idea?
Thanks
Paulo Estrela
___
On 10/26/07, Krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the SDK that I installed with Carbide I remember seeing binutils
> and friends. So I suppose that a GCC cross compiler is being used for
> building the code which means g++ is a supported compiler. Now,
> assuming that the symbian os itself is bu
Krishna wrote:
On 10/26/07, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are talking about Symbian OS here. For linux and windows mobile
devices, I understand you can use FPC directly, right?
Sorry, you said Winemulator. I read "windows emulator" not "emulator for
windows". My bad.
As for t
On 10/26/07, Matt Emson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Krishna wrote:
> > Another thing, the code produced for the winemulator target is x86
> > code or arm code?
> Depends. The Visual Studio 2003 emulator is x86. Based on the VirtualPC
> core product. The Visual Studio 2005.. um.. I don't remember.
Krishna wrote:
Another thing, the code produced for the winemulator target is x86
code or arm code?
Depends. The Visual Studio 2003 emulator is x86. Based on the VirtualPC
core product. The Visual Studio 2005.. um.. I don't remember. I know
Microsoft provide an ARM emulator that runs dog slow.
On 10/26/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/26/07, Krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How do you map the C++ API? by hand? Is it possible to tailor the
> > > "Direct class wrapper"
> > >
On 10/26/07, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/26/07, Krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How do you map the C++ API? by hand? Is it possible to tailor the
> > "Direct class wrapper"
> > (http://milan.marusinec.sk/articles-icu4pas/icu4pas-dcw.html) approach
> > to AR
On 10/26/07, Krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I saw the wiki page. Does it work on S60 2nd/3rd edition phones too?
No. But they are similar, so if uiq works, the s60 support can be
build reusing a lot of what was developed for uiq. The base operating
system is the same, so I guess the RT
14 matches
Mail list logo