Johann Glaser wrote:
Is there any documentation (like the things you've written in this
thread) in the Wiki? If not, I'd like to copy-paste (and clean up) your
discussion. Please point me to a place where the information best fits.
I was also thinking the same ;) . I've created a stub here:
h
One of my customers asked me if I can recompile a Delphi application that uses
TDataSet
descendants. Can someone tell me if FPC's TDataSet implementation is compatible
with Delphi's?, or
I must rewrite the whole application?.
Thanks in advance.
Leonardo M. Ramé
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
Hi!
Am Freitag, den 10.08.2007, 15:24 +0200 schrieb Michael Van Canneyt:
>
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> > On 10/08/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's super configurable.
> > >
> > > ./fpmake --help
> > >
> > > will give you all options, in
Bisma Jayadi schrieb:
>> In that case, did you adapt the libgsf-1.so library name, or specify
>> the directory where it can be found ?
>
> I'd had installed the required libs as mentioned in the source files and
> also the related libs as well. I believe I had specified the path too.
> But, maybe
In that case, did you adapt the libgsf-1.so library name, or specify the directory
where it can be found ?
I'd had installed the required libs as mentioned in the source files and also
the related libs as well. I believe I had specified the path too. But, maybe I
have to make sure this again.
Thanks for the code. What example were you trying to compile? Didn't you
create a package file for the component? Just give me a startingpoint
No, I didn't do that far (create a package). Just to make sure first the
component will be compiled by FPC 2.0.4. Sorry, I forgot to give you the
exam
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
> > If you are referring to the treetron component,
> > http://treetron.googlepages.com/
>
> No, it's not.
>
> > then you misunderstand it's design.
>
> I know.
>
> > It's not going to work, since at the core of it is a binary library which
> > uses
>
If you are referring to the treetron component,
http://treetron.googlepages.com/
No, it's not.
then you misunderstand it's design.
I know.
It's not going to work, since at the core of it is a binary library which uses
the TMS component. Presumably FPC does not find the library, hence the l
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm now trying to compile FlexCel v.2.5.3 (latest open source version before
> it's bought by TMS) using FPC v.2.0.4 on Linux (Kubuntu 6.10 Feitsy). After
> adding IFDEFs here and there, finally FPC is able to compile it. But, I don't
> kno
I'm now trying to compile FlexCel v.2.5.3 (latest open source version
before it's bought by TMS) using FPC v.2.0.4 on Linux (Kubuntu 6.10
Feitsy). After adding IFDEFs here and there, finally FPC is able to
compile it. But, I don't know why FPC fails to linking program (to
executable) that uses
Hi all,
I'm now trying to compile FlexCel v.2.5.3 (latest open source version before
it's bought by TMS) using FPC v.2.0.4 on Linux (Kubuntu 6.10 Feitsy). After
adding IFDEFs here and there, finally FPC is able to compile it. But, I don't
know why FPC fails to linking program (to executable) t
>> The idea is that you do a
>>
>> fppkg
>>
>> this will look in a database for the package, extract it,
>> and the compile fpmake.pp and run it. The fpmake contains
>> all configuration to make and zip the package.
>>
> Aha, this clears up some mist in my mind. But I still don't really
> understa
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 10/08/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > It's super configurable.
> >
> > ./fpmake --help
> >
> > will give you all options, in good unix tradition :-)
>
> And here I thought I would trip you up with my fpGUI example. :)
On 10/08/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It's super configurable.
>
> ./fpmake --help
>
> will give you all options, in good unix tradition :-)
And here I thought I would trip you up with my fpGUI example. :)
Excellent work and thanks for the clear example code.
Regards,
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 10/08/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > T:=Targets.AddUnit('myunit');
> > T.ResourceStrings:=True;
> > T:=Targets.AddUnit('myprogram');
> > T.AddDependency('myunit');
>
> Does this take directories as wel
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Darius Blaszijk wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > The idea is that you do a
> >
> > fppkg
> >
> > this will look in a database for the package, extract it, and the compile
> > fpmake.pp and run it. The fpmake contains
> > all configuration to make an
On 10/08/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> T:=Targets.AddUnit('myunit');
> T.ResourceStrings:=True;
> T:=Targets.AddUnit('myprogram');
> T.AddDependency('myunit');
Does this take directories as well?
Here is a fpGUI layout example:
Windows:
src/corelib/gdi/g
> uses
> Classes,
Standard.
> Sysutils,
Standard.
> U_Global, L_Lockdata, U_Strings, U_RegExpr, L_Wintol, U_Images,
> U_Stream, U_Tiff, U_Tiff_Tags, U_Tiff_Global, U_Pixels, L_Mathe,
> U_Wininfo
Custom looks fairly "in house" too. I assume U stands for Unit and L
stands for Libra
> sorry for asking such a total newbie question, but I have some
> (apparently) Delphi code and I my goal is to examine if it is feasible
> to port this to Mac OS X.
>
> Now, it lists a lot of units, and google is not very helpful. So my
> question is: Are these standard Delphi units?
No.
Hello,
sorry for asking such a total newbie question, but I have some
(apparently) Delphi code and I my goal is to examine if it is feasible
to port this to Mac OS X.
Now, it lists a lot of units, and google is not very helpful. So my
question is: Are these standard Delphi units? Third pa
Hi Michael,
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
The idea is that you do a
fppkg
this will look in a database for the package, extract it,
and the compile fpmake.pp and run it. The fpmake contains
all configuration to make and zip the package.
Aha, this clears up some mist in my mind. But I still
Thanks for the quick response Michael. I'll have a look at those files shortly.
Graeme.
On 10/08/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The upcoming 2.2 will contain the basics for a package system.
> Look at all directories in the fpc source dirs. You'll find there
> a fpmake.
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I heard somewhere in a list that Makefile's are on the way out (for
> FPC) and a alternative is in the pipeline. Can anybody shed some
> light on this and if the alternative is usable yet?
>
> I want FPC developers without Lazarus to be
Hi,
I heard somewhere in a list that Makefile's are on the way out (for
FPC) and a alternative is in the pipeline. Can anybody shed some
light on this and if the alternative is usable yet?
I want FPC developers without Lazarus to be able to compile fpGUI.
Before, I tried to use Makefiles, but my
24 matches
Mail list logo
