Hi all,
To see what the differences in speed are between MSEdb and fcl-db I did
some benchmarks. (See the attachment for the code and results)
I think that the first conclusion is that when it comes to executing
queries, opening connections to the database and such, the 'real sql-
work' there's n
Dear all,
Today, when I try to use Windows Common Control in
FPC, well I got error, and when I check in FPC
installation folder, I cannot found the implementation
for CommCtrl.o or CommCtrl.pp either. And also in last
week email, someone mentioned that WinSpool is not
implemented too.
Is it true,
Hi Everyone,
How can I used #IFDEF to check which is the Fpc Release (something like
#IFDEF FPC_RELEASE=4)?
I have several version of fpc (2.1.4, 2.1.5, 2.3.1) and fpc.cfg is different
in each case.
how can I check it?
or, Is there any form to use a #IFDEF in fpc.cfg if compiler where build
with
On Monday 16 July 2007 13.50, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 16:05 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 July 2007 13.06, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 07:24 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > > > I needed to use my own TField descendants becau
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
Since we are on the topic, I've been using Parallels Desktop for Mac
with a lot of success. It's pretty cheap, and you have 2 weeks to see
if you want to buy it. They have some bugs when running Linux, but
their Windows support is incredible. Windows seams to ac
Since we are on the topic, I've been using Parallels Desktop for Mac
with a lot of success. It's pretty cheap, and you have 2 weeks to see
if you want to buy it. They have some bugs when running Linux, but
their Windows support is incredible. Windows seams to actually work
better and faster then i
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Vincent Snijders:
> Daniël Mantione schreef:
> >
> > Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
> >
> > > and hello.exe actually runs at the other side of the fence.
> >
> > Note that you can install Wine (I'm not sure though how the Darwin port
> > hasprogresse
Daniël Mantione schreef:
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
and hello.exe actually runs at the other side of the fence.
Note that you can install Wine (I'm not sure though how the Darwin port
hasprogressed) to do testing. With Wine you can do the full development
without a Window
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
> and hello.exe actually runs at the other side of the fence.
Note that you can install Wine (I'm not sure though how the Darwin port
hasprogressed) to do testing. With Wine you can do the full development
without a Windows computer and you only ne
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
/usr/local/lib/fpc/2.3.1/units/i386-win32/rtl
install: ../../rtl/units/i386-win32/rtlconsts.ppu: No such file or directory
make: *** [fpc_install] Error 71
Most of the win32 rtl is built by a build unit called buildrtl.pp
i
On 15 Jul 2007, at 07:43, Weyert de Boer wrote:
I am trying to get the lightweight freepascal e.g. fpide working
under MacOSX. Only I am not getting it compiled! Does anyone know
of a place where this IDE is precompiled?
http://pascal-central.com/lwp/lightweight.html
Jonas
__
On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 16:05 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> On Sunday 15 July 2007 13.06, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 07:24 +0200, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > > I needed to use my own TField descendants because I can not modify
> > > db.pp .
> >
> > Huh? Why can't you? You
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
> /usr/local/lib/fpc/2.3.1/units/i386-win32/rtl
> install: ../../rtl/units/i386-win32/rtlconsts.ppu: No such file or directory
> make: *** [fpc_install] Error 71
Most of the win32 rtl is built by a build unit called buildrtl.pp
in the directory rtl/
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
Has anyone tried to build a Free Pascal Windows crosscompiler on an Intel Mac
? Is this supported ?
Yes, you don't need a cross-compiler to cross-compile to different
operating systems. With FPC 2.1.4+ you don't need binuti
Op Mon, 16 Jul 2007, schreef Adriaan van Os:
> Has anyone tried to build a Free Pascal Windows crosscompiler on an Intel Mac
> ? Is this supported ?
Yes, you don't need a cross-compiler to cross-compile to different
operating systems. With FPC 2.1.4+ you don't need binutils either to
cross-co
Has anyone tried to build a Free Pascal Windows crosscompiler on an Intel Mac ?
Is this supported ?
First I built and mingw binutils and then I tried
[p17:~/fpc-win32/fpc] adriaan% make all OS_TARGET=win32 CROSSBINDIR=/usr/bin
BINUTILSPREFIX=i686-ming32- INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local
make compile
On 16/07/07, josepascual <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I can build fpc for arm 2.2 (ver 2.1.5) and I can build 2.3.1 for with "-Ce
-CfSOFT" options.
I have a board with a ARM EABI systems, and I'd like to develop some
programs with freepascal for ARM.
Which should I use 2.2_beta or 2
Hi everyone,
I can build fpc for arm 2.2 (ver 2.1.5) and I can build 2.3.1 for with "-Ce
-CfSOFT" options.
I have a board with a ARM EABI systems, and I'd like to develop some
programs with freepascal for ARM.
Which should I use 2.2_beta or 2.3.1?
Is softfloat implemented in both solution? or m
18 matches
Mail list logo
