Please point me to the FreePascal/Lazarus BugZilla. :P
On Friday 22 June 2007 18:55, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 6/21/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1. MessageDlg function shows the text, but doesn't show the buttons
> > [mbOK] and [mbCancel].
> > 2. The me
On 6/22/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please point me to the FreePascal/Lazarus BugZilla. :P
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/How_do_I_create_a_bug_report
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://l
On 6/21/07, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. MessageDlg function shows the text, but doesn't show the buttons [mbOK] and
[mbCancel].
2. The menu in KCalculator doesn't show. It's there, but the EditResult TEdit
component along with the butons just top it, instead of sitting
On Friday 22 June 2007 11.19, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 22 jun 2007, at 00:17, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> > I see the following options, start with the IMHO most preferable to
> > the least preferable:
> > A: merge those patches to the fixes branch now.
>
> As far as the checksynchronize patch is conc
Hi Paul,
> Hi Jose :-)
> I can't help you with your problem, but I am curious...
thanks anyway,
> 1)is your ARM system using Linux?
yes,
> 2)for Lua under ARM, are you using dynamic linking or static
> linking?
i'm using dynamic linking but you can use static if you want.
> For dynamic l
On 22 jun 2007, at 00:17, Vincent Snijders wrote:
I see the following options, start with the IMHO most preferable to
the least preferable:
A: merge those patches to the fixes branch now.
As far as the checksynchronize patch is concerned: since it (almost?)
only affects Lazarus and mside,
- Original Message -
From: Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 22, 2007 10:04 am
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] CheckSynchronize
> On 6/22/07, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is not that we can't use the release, but we (at least I)
> rather
On 6/22/07, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is not that we can't use the release, but we (at least I) rather risk a
possible instability rather than have some some known bugs and limitations. And
that I want to invest time in it by distributing patched versions of fpc. I
think t
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
> On 22/06/07, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Some time ago, Graeme Geldenhuys (hope I spelled this correct from memory)
> > posted some TFPTimer component to this list.
>
> The name is 100% correct. :-)
> Thanks for taking m
