Hi Jonas,
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Jonas Maebe
> Enviado el: miércoles, 13 de junio de 2007 11:42
> Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Asunto: Re: [fpc-pascal] this line in pascal compile for i386 version
> but arm
On 14 jun 2007, at 19:04, Luca Olivetti wrote:
No suggestions? Is there some special option (apart from -g) that I
should specify to compile/link my program?
No. But the garbage backtrace means that either your gdb cannot parse
the signal handler frame, or that your program corrupted the c
En/na Luca Olivetti ha escrit:
Hello,
I'm trying to debug a segment violation, I compiled the program with -g,
but analyzing the core dump isn't really helpful, maybe the "warning
can't read pathname for load map" is the cause? Or it's possible that
it's caused by some of the c libraries used
no - that was not the problem. I have my linux running in a coLinux
session and it seems that the linker fails, when the file is in a
windows drive, even as root. other programms don't have problems to read
or write to this drive.
but there is still a strange problem with the dynamic library:
On 14 jun 2007, at 12:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, programs with a writeln() have lower performance, but
I think, printf() and writeln() must do the same. This need time to
calculate.
But the difference between printf() and writeln() are so, that
the fpc program breaks wi
Hi
thank's at all for your help!
Here some more Information:
1.) I think, that the inc(counter) procedure is faster then counter:=counter+1;.
In the FreePascal book (Free Pascal; M. van Canneyt,F. Klämpfl; C&L; 2000;
ISBN 3-932311-67-1; S. 519) you can find this information.
2.) I think,
