> Exploring the site founded the forums.
> Saw a post from June 2005 which describes there were problems trying to get
> it to work in FreeBSD.
> http://community.freepascal.org:1/bboards/message?message_id=155642&foru
> m_id=24096
>
> Don't see an IDE in the port. Does the problem still e
Francisco Reyes пишет:
...
Don't see an IDE in the port. Does the problem still exists getting
the IDE to work in FreeBSD?
/usr/ports/editors/fpc-ide/
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/li
Exploring the site founded the forums.
Saw a post from June 2005 which describes there were problems trying to get
it to work in FreeBSD.
http://community.freepascal.org:1/bboards/message?message_id=155642&foru
m_id=24096
Don't see an IDE in the port. Does the problem still exists gettin
I finished reading my old pascal book and reading up on PDFs from the site.
Was wondering how would I find features unique to FPC that my old Pascal
book would not have... Basically features that I would not to look for, but
that are helpfull. ie.. I remembered exception handling (try except...
Catalin Zamfir Alexandru writes:
Ya, Pascal's better than C :P. That's my personal oppinion. And Free Pascal
is "the cherry on top".
In theory the project I am planning to do, Postfix policy server, could have
been done in Python (another language I like) but I have been looking for an
excus
> I saw the latest beta release of Morfik has using Indy10. Since Morfik is
> using FPC for the backend compiler, does this mean that every Indy10
> component is already in stable state for FPC? I ask this because the
> information at FPC wiki
> (http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Indy_wi
Ya, Pascal's better than C :P. That's my personal oppinion. And Free Pascal
is "the cherry on top".
On Monday 28 May 2007 13:55, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> > Is there a separate list for documentation?
> >
> > In particular I was wondering if there
Cesar Romero wrote:
Luiz Americo,
This was my first idea. And now gains force again. The problem is
that the bug can not be isolated easily.
Another option is that there's a mem leak in delphi also. Does some
one know how to trace a mem leak in delphi?
Use FastMM with FullDebugOptions
I
On Mon, 28 May 2007, Bisma Jayadi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I saw the latest beta release of Morfik has using Indy10. Since Morfik is
> using FPC for the backend compiler, does this mean that every Indy10 component
> is already in stable state for FPC? I ask this because the information at FPC
> wik
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Is there a separate list for documentation?
>
> In particular I was wondering if there was any interest in adding some
> examples to the Socket section in the RTL documentation.
> As I am getting re-familiarized with pascal I am finding examples in
On 28 May 2007, at 10:31, Catalin Zamfir Alexandru wrote:
Ya, I mean if its an universal binary, it may as well run on any
system, any
version. And as BSDs versions are related with each others, as well
as with
Unix systems, why not?
Because library names and symbol names sometimes change
Ya, I mean if its an universal binary, it may as well run on any system, any
version. And as BSDs versions are related with each others, as well as with
Unix systems, why not?
On Monday 28 May 2007 10:26, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > I was trying out a couple of examples and figured I would try
Hi all,
I saw the latest beta release of Morfik has using Indy10. Since Morfik is using
FPC for the backend compiler, does this mean that every Indy10 component is
already in stable state for FPC? I ask this because the information at FPC wiki
(http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Indy
> I was trying out a couple of examples and figured I would try to see how
> portable the binaries were.
>
> Compiled a trivial program in FreeBSD 6.2 Stable and copied it to a 4.9
> machine. The binary worked.
>
> Is that commontly the case? ie the binaries can be run accross different
> Free
On 5/28/07, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Graeme Geldenhuys wrote:
>
> The virtual treeview has already been ported twice by two different
> people. Any particular reason you are doing it again?
>
> See the link for one of the ports...
> http://tinyurl.com/2uxewm
>
> The
15 matches
Mail list logo
