Op Tue, 22 May 2007, schreef Hans-Joerg Vasold:
> > I'm happy to announce that release 2.1.4 aka 2.2.0 beta is out.
>
> Since the 2.2.0 Roadmap says :
>
> --- "Next major Version (2.2)
> --- [...]
> --- Support for dynamic libararies
> --- [...] support for dynamic linking and packages.
I'm happy to announce that release 2.1.4 aka 2.2.0 beta is out.
Since the 2.2.0 Roadmap says :
--- "Next major Version (2.2)
--- [...]
--- Support for dynamic libararies
--- [...] support for dynamic linking and packages.
just a short question, are this features (dynamic packages) availa
Op Tue, 22 May 2007, schreef Tomas Hajny:
> I don't know Linux, but: If ioperm needs to be called just once (without
> specifying a particular port number), this call could be added to unit
> initialization. If it needs to be called for particular port number or
> port range, we could add a func
Daniël Mantione wrote:
> Op Tue, 22 May 2007, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
>
>> OS specific code is not a devil. Sometimes it's necessary. Ports alone
>> won't work on linux also, by the way.
>
> Even if extra calls are needed, like ioperm, the existance of a hardware
> serial port unit, ig
On 22 mei 2007, at 11:20, Christos Chryssochoidis wrote:
Jonas Maebe wrote:
Sorry, my fault. Since I don't have an Intel Mac myself I was not
able to test the installer package and the installation
requirements settings I added to it. I've now however tested a
similar setting for the PP
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 21 mei 2007, at 22:58, Christos Chryssochoidis wrote:
I downloaded the new FPC version, 2.1.4, for the Intel Mac platform
to try it. When I try to install it the installer refuses to proceed,
saying that "this package contains only Intel binaries which cannot
be used on
Op Tue, 22 May 2007, schreef Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
>
> OS specific code is not a devil. Sometimes it's necessary. Ports alone
> won't work on linux also, by the way.
Even if extra calls are needed, like ioperm, the existance of a hardware
serial port unit, ignoring the existance of iop
On 21 mei 2007, at 22:58, Christos Chryssochoidis wrote:
I downloaded the new FPC version, 2.1.4, for the Intel Mac platform
to try it. When I try to install it the installer refuses to
proceed, saying that "this package contains only Intel binaries
which cannot be used on a PowerPC-based
Op Tue, 22 May 2007, schreef Alexey Pavluchenko:
> Hello Felipe,
>
> Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 10:48:54 AM, you wrote:
>
> > On 5/18/07, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Can you please implement a ports unit for Windows then?
>
> > This requires writing a Device Driver for NT
Hello Felipe,
Tuesday, May 22, 2007, 10:48:54 AM, you wrote:
> On 5/18/07, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can you please implement a ports unit for Windows then?
> This requires writing a Device Driver for NT and later you need to
> take it with your executable somehow.
It's
Matt Emson schrieb:
>> Why no?
>
> Because Windows CE <> Win32. Smartphone more so. However, the word
> "probably" conveyed my doubt that I had all the facts. There you go.
FPC supports and works on wince. I ran already lazarus applications on
my Smartphone which has the same processor iirc.
On 5/18/07, Daniël Mantione <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you please implement a ports unit for Windows then?
This requires writing a Device Driver for NT and later you need to
take it with your executable somehow.
The last thing we need is people to start using OS specific code.
OS sp
Hello guys,
Which Pocket PC emulator are you using for development with fpc?
I tryed to install an emulator on my notebook, followed the same link
as before, but it seams that MS updated their emulator
(unfortunately).
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=C62D54A5-183A-4A1E-
13 matches
Mail list logo
