On 26/02/07, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 26 feb 2007, at 15:23, Henry Vermaak wrote:
> /home/hcv/freepascal/latest/compiler/ppcrossarm -Ur -Parm
> -XParmbe-linux- -Xc -Xr -Ur -Xs -O1r -n -Fi../inc -Fi../arm -Fi../unix
> -Fiarm -FE. -FU/home/hcv/freepascal/latest/rtl/units/arm-linu
On 26 feb 2007, at 15:23, Henry Vermaak wrote:
/home/hcv/freepascal/latest/compiler/ppcrossarm -Ur -Parm
-XParmbe-linux- -Xc -Xr -Ur -Xs -O1r -n -Fi../inc -Fi../arm -Fi../unix
-Fiarm -FE. -FU/home/hcv/freepascal/latest/rtl/units/arm-linux -darm
-dRELEASE -Fi../objpas/sysutils ../unix/sysutils.
thanks, i'll try this.
henry
with latest fpc svn i try 'make distclean all CPU_TARGET=arm
BINUTILSPREFIX=armbe-linux-' and get this (after a while):
/home/hcv/freepascal/latest/compiler/ppcrossarm -Ur -Parm
-XParmbe-linux- -Xc -Xr -Ur -Xs -O1r -n -Fi../inc -Fi../arm -Fi../unix
-Fiarm -FE. -F
On Monday 26 February 2007 12:07, Matt Emson wrote:
> > Well, let's do the standard:
> >
> > Pascal:
> >
> >program
> > Hello_World;
> >
> >begin
> > WriteLn ('Hello world.');
> >end.
>
> Class: What does program mean?
"That this unit is supposed to be a program. (Still, yo
On 26 feb 2007, at 13:07, Matt Emson wrote:
Class: What does program mean?
Moderator: can you all please take language comparison discussions to
fpc-other?
Thanks.
Jonas
FPC Mailing lists admin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.free
FPC cannot use libc for fpu emulation.
> also, is the "SOFT" option complete in latest fpc? this would
> probably save me lots of trouble.
Yes, softfpu should work on ARM.
Daniël
thanks, i'll try this.
henry
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal
Op Mon, 26 Feb 2007, schreef Henry Vermaak:
> hi all
>
> i managed to build a ppcarm (msb) over the last couple of days. there
> were a couple of problems, most problematic of which were that the
> compiler (ppccrossarm at that stage) seemed to go into a weird "state"
> when trying to compile
hi all
i managed to build a ppcarm (msb) over the last couple of days. there
were a couple of problems, most problematic of which were that the
compiler (ppccrossarm at that stage) seemed to go into a weird "state"
when trying to compile the gtk and gtk2 packages (can't remember
specific files n
> Well, let's do the standard:
>
> Pascal:
>
>program
> Hello_World;
>
>begin
> WriteLn ('Hello world.');
>end.
Class: What does program mean? Does the name matter? Does it have to be the
same as the executable? Why is there a colon at the end of the line - isn't
the begin
> > [explaining classes is not really harder than program/unit]
> I disagree with this part. Sure, you will get questions of about
> programs/units, but the purpose of the keywords belonging to them is way
> easier to explain than public, static and class.
To a complete novice, there's not really
Op Mon, 26 Feb 2007, schreef Matt Emson:
> > Read the draft here and tell me what you think of it and whether you
> > have something to add:
>
> [explaining classes is not really harder than program/unit]
I disagree with this part. Sure, you will get questions of about
programs/units, but th
On Monday 26 February 2007 10:13, Matt Emson wrote:
> I had a fairly quick glance through; I think you missed the point.
> Most of your arguments point to something like VB3, not Pascal, ADA
> or C. You mention the syntax of the Java class - Pacal and ADA are
> both more complicated.
Well, let's
> Most of your arguments point to something like VB3
To clarify, I mean in "language complexity". In VB 3, one could (with little
extra knowledge) code in BASIC quite quickly.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free
> Read the draft here and tell me what you think of it and whether you
> have something to add:
I had a fairly quick glance through; I think you missed the point. Most of
your arguments point to something like VB3, not Pascal, ADA or C. You
mention the syntax of the Java class - Pacal and ADA are
14 matches
Mail list logo
