On 2/23/07, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Felipe, as you have noticed, I have unblocked the main page. Please let
me know when you are finished with it.
I am finished. It can be improved, but I'm out of ideas =)
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
_
Florian Klaempfl schreef:
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
I couldn´t find it because I am used to ignoring the About section.
IMHO the links to fpc things aren´t as easy to find as they could be,
specially to new users.
My suggestion would be to add a small section for FPC of the same size
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
I couldn´t find it because I am used to ignoring the About section.
IMHO the links to fpc things aren´t as easy to find as they could be,
specially to new users.
My suggestion would be to add a small section for FPC of the same size
as the "The Lazarus Docume
Op Sat, 24 Feb 2007, schreef Krishna:
> Hi all,
>
> Is it possible (ok, without too much work) to make a standalone
> version of the assembler buried inside fpc?
It is possible and doable, however, I'm not sure what your definition of
"not much work" is.
> Would be interesting as it
> would
en a (descriptive) bug report (in case there is none about this issue
> yet) and attach a test case.
>
> Micha
> ___
> fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
> http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>
Hi all,
Is it possible (ok, without too much work) to make a standalone
version of the assembler buried inside fpc? Would be interesting as it
would be able to handle both AT&T and Intel syntax.
I tried feeding some (straight) asm files to the compiler (silly me!)
but it bombed. Does fpc accept
I couldn´t find it because I am used to ignoring the About section.
IMHO the links to fpc things aren´t as easy to find as they could be,
specially to new users.
My suggestion would be to add a small section for FPC of the same size
as the "The Lazarus Documentation Project" section on the main p
Jose Pascual wrote:
> Could it be resolved in 2.1.1?
>
> I'm compiling ppcrossarm 2.1.1 in order to be it's corrected in this
> version,
Open a (descriptive) bug report (in case there is none about this issue
yet) and attach a test case.
Micha
___
fpc-
I can read incoming characters, so the connection is ok and lHandle is
valid. I tried TCIOFLUSH as another QueSelector and tried also ioctl
instead of Fpioctl.
termio.tcflush but that does
fpioctl(fd,TCIOflush,pointer(qsel));
TCFlush is working now. Thank you.
Regards, Bernd.
Op Fri, 23 Feb 2007, schreef Jose Pascual:
>
> > -Mensaje original-
> > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Daniël Mantione
> > Enviado el: viernes, 23 de febrero de 2007 9:51
> > Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions
> > Asunto: RE: [fpc-pascal] FP
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:fpc-pascal-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Daniël Mantione
> Enviado el: viernes, 23 de febrero de 2007 9:51
> Para: FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Asunto: RE: [fpc-pascal] FPC for Scratchbox-ARM (compiling with errors)
>
>
>
> Op F
Op Fri, 23 Feb 2007, schreef Jose Pascual:
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x40094018 in _IO_file_xsputn () from /lib/libc.so.6
> >
> > any idea about this problem? (perhaps 2.1.1 snapshot?)
>
>
> any idea or suggestion?
Your C code crashes. That is not something
Hi everyone,
I have testing ppcrossarm 2.0.4 (also 2.1.1 in other situations) for ARM It
work enough good
I have introduce in the test program Dynamic Array. It's working well in
ppc386 but ppcarm
in a debug session with gdb I have found segmentation fault working sometime
accessing data contain
> > > >
> > > > > Assembling test1
> > > > > Linking test1
> > > > > /usr/local/lib/fpc/2.1.1/units/arm-linux/rtl/cprt0.o: In
> function
> > > > > `_haltproc':
> > > > > : undefined reference to `_fini'
> > > > > /usr/local/lib/fpc/2.1.1/units/arm-linux/rtl/cprt0.o: In
> function
> > > > > `_haltpr
14 matches
Mail list logo
