Re: [fpc-pascal] Commercial components port taskforce

2007-02-17 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 2/17/07, Marc PERTRON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have also been disappointed that the Lazarus solution for Mac is based on X Windows and will as such not work natively on Mac. Ok, in the mean time the Qt interface did in fact advance a lot. One of my projects, the magnifier ( http://magni

Re: [fpc-pascal] Commercial components port taskforce

2007-02-17 Thread Marc PERTRON
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho a écrit : On 2/17/07, Marc PERTRON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I asked the TMS Component team if a port to FP was possible. The answer is yes, at some conditions (native support of Qt for Mac OS, better component support for Lazarus) I didn´t really understand this s

Re: [fpc-pascal] Commercial components port taskforce

2007-02-17 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
On 2/17/07, Marc PERTRON <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I asked the TMS Component team if a port to FP was possible. The answer is yes, at some conditions (native support of Qt for Mac OS, better component support for Lazarus) I didn´t really understand this sentence. Is it that Lazarus qt interfac

[fpc-pascal] Commercial components port taskforce

2007-02-17 Thread Marc PERTRON
Hi everyone, Today, for me) one of the biggest problem to use Lazarus and FPC in commercial application is the lack of visual components. Of course, i didn't have enough spare time to port the one i need. I asked the TMS Component team if a port to FP was possible. The answer is yes, at some con