At 23:39 5-2-2007, you wrote:
I think that its great that the hornet's nest that I stirred up might
mean that a new unit of container classes gets written...
...My trouble remains...
Getting a better containers unit is nice, but the root of the
problem seems to be the memory manager. Delphi's
Does somebody have something in source that they'd share
with this poor guy, please?
Maybe you can find something here?
http://torry.net/pages.php?id=256
- Jeff
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/
Wayne Sherman wrote:
> Getting a better containers unit is nice, but the root of the problem
> seems to be the memory manager. Delphi's old memory manager had
No.
> fragmentation issues also. That is why NexusMM, BucketMM and FastMM we
The memory manager cannot fix fragmentation in TStringList
>> As no
>> SCO install is available (and I understand why), I'm kinda between the
>> rock
>> and the hard place.
>
>Well, I don't see why one would bother with SCO nowadays. However, if you
>want to do it, be our guest :)
It's not a matter of wanting to, it's a matter of having to. Business
de
Daniël Mantione wrote:
Op Tue, 6 Feb 2007, schreef Tiziano_mk:
I presume you ask this because you would like to translate that FAQ entry.
exactly, the translation is made litterally, but my wife doesn't like it :-)
of his boots. In general it means "get something" starting with nearly
no
Op Tue, 6 Feb 2007, schreef Tiziano_mk:
> Vincent Snijders wrote:
> > Tiziano_mk schreef:
> > >
> > What do you understand? What is it that you don't understand?
> >
> > >
> > > Bootstrapping:
> > > FPC requires a suitable set of binutils (AS,AR,LD), gmake and a
>
> ok, here is a nice explan
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Tiziano_mk schreef:
What do you understand? What is it that you don't understand?
Bootstrapping:
FPC requires a suitable set of binutils (AS,AR,LD), gmake and a
ok, here is a nice explanation from Marco's buildfaq glossary:
"bootstrapping is the entire process of
Op Tue, 6 Feb 2007, schreef Marco van de Voort:
> > Marco van de Voort schrieb:
> > >
> > > This ranges from Windows 64-bit
> >
> > I use and maintain Win64 daily?
>
> So does Peter with Solaris. And Tomas(/Daniel?) with OS/2. But it rather
> limited compared to the core platforms (even OS X
> Marco van de Voort schrieb:
> >
> > This ranges from Windows 64-bit
>
> I use and maintain Win64 daily?
So does Peter with Solaris. And Tomas(/Daniel?) with OS/2. But it rather
limited compared to the core platforms (even OS X, e.g. Jonas, Vincent and
me all have macs)
There is a reason why
Marco van de Voort schrieb:
>
> This ranges from Windows 64-bit
I use and maintain Win64 daily?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
> Op Mon, 5 Feb 2007, schreef Daaave:
> > As no
> > SCO install is available (and I understand why), I'm kinda between the rock
> > and the hard place.
>
> Well, I don't see why one would bother with SCO nowadays. However, if you
> want to do it, be our guest :)
Didn't Carl mess with SCO at some
On 05 Feb 2007, at 20:52, Daaave wrote:
However -- Am I correct in my understanding that I need the FPC
compiler to
compile the FPC compiler?
Yes.
If so, how far back to I have to go version-wise
to get a compiler that doesn't require the FPC compiler to
compile? As no
SCO install is a
Op Mon, 5 Feb 2007, schreef Daaave:
>
> We're presently using an *old* (DOS) Pascal compiler on SCO Unix.
> Unfortunately, we've reached the end of the usable life of this compiler.
> The replacement we've provisionally chosen is FPC.
>
> I've been using the Windows version of the IDE and c
> I am not sure to understand this text from FPC FAQs item no. 3.
> Can someone explain better?
>
> Bootstrapping:
> FPC requires a suitable set of binutils (AS,AR,LD), gmake and a
> commandline compiler. New architectures/OSes are crosscompiled. GPC
> bootstraps via a suitable version of GCC, and
Daaave schrieb:
> We're presently using an *old* (DOS) Pascal compiler on SCO Unix.
> Unfortunately, we've reached the end of the usable life of this compiler.
> The replacement we've provisionally chosen is FPC.
>
> I've been using the Windows version of the IDE and compiler to convert my
> so
We're presently using an *old* (DOS) Pascal compiler on SCO Unix.
Unfortunately, we've reached the end of the usable life of this compiler.
The replacement we've provisionally chosen is FPC.
I've been using the Windows version of the IDE and compiler to convert my
source files, and am quite pl
On 06 Feb 2007, at 09:49, Tiziano_mk wrote:
I am not sure to understand this text from FPC FAQs item no. 3.
Can someone explain better?
Bootstrapping:
FPC requires a suitable set of binutils (AS,AR,LD), gmake and a
commandline compiler.
"a command line compiler" should actually read "a exist
Tiziano_mk schreef:
I am not sure to understand this text from FPC FAQs item no. 3.
Can someone explain better?
What do you understand? What is it that you don't understand?
Bootstrapping:
FPC requires a suitable set of binutils (AS,AR,LD), gmake and a
commandline compiler. New architecture
I am not sure to understand this text from FPC FAQs item no. 3.
Can someone explain better?
Bootstrapping:
FPC requires a suitable set of binutils (AS,AR,LD), gmake and a
commandline compiler. New architectures/OSes are crosscompiled. GPC
bootstraps via a suitable version of GCC, and requires a
> Am Sonntag, den 28.01.2007, 22:55 +0100 schrieb Marco van de Voort:
> (verified by compiling lazarus). The missing link from the start on was
> the -Xf switch and a clean de- and reinstallation.
>
> So I'm happy but there are some small questions left:
>
> What about the other two items
>
> fp
20 matches
Mail list logo
