Re: [fpc-pascal] Linux Install: Is it me or the documentation? ;-)

2006-10-31 Thread Lev Lafayette
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 09:10 +0100, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, Lev Lafayette wrote: > > > On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 15:58 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Lev Lafayette wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > First let me say how pleased I am to disco

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
2006/10/31, Jesus Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: --- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi all, > > I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest > compiler > in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? > Using > revision 3823 I have no problems. >

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: At 21:59 31-10-2006, you wrote: >2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote: >> >Hi all, >> > >> >I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler >> >in svn. Is there a compiler switch required

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Jesus Reyes
--- Alexandre Leclerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > Hi all, > > I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest > compiler > in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? > Using > revision 3823 I have no problems. > > The parameters in the script when passed to

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Peter Vreman
At 21:59 31-10-2006, you wrote: 2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler >in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using >revision 3823 I have no problems.

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Micha Nelissen
Alexandre Leclerc wrote: >> That are 1300+ revisions. Try doing a binary search. That will take 11 >> tests. > > How do a do such a thing? You know binary search right ? Use svn diff -r X, with X varying between working and newest revision, until you found X-1 working, X not. Micha _

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Alexandre Leclerc schrieb: 2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler >in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using >revision 3823 I have no problems. > >T

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
2006/10/31, Peter Vreman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote: >Hi all, > >I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler >in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using >revision 3823 I have no problems. > >The parameters in the script

Re: [fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Peter Vreman
At 21:08 31-10-2006, you wrote: Hi all, I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using revision 3823 I have no problems. The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not working well..

[fpc-pascal] ROPS and latest FPC compiler (svn)

2006-10-31 Thread Alexandre Leclerc
Hi all, I'm running into strang ROPS behaviour when using the latest compiler in svn. Is there a compiler switch required for it to work ok? Using revision 3823 I have no problems. The parameters in the script when passed to actual FPC code is not working well.. this was an old bug... parameter