On 7/22/06, Mattias Gaertner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I updated the wiki.
The install directory is now in the fpcbuild repository:
svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/fpcbuild/branches/fixes_2_0/install
install
Thank you Mattias! I now seem to have all I need. Looks pretty
straight forw
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006 14:55:13 -0400
"Tamara Bunke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings to the List:
>
> I installed FPC-2.0.2 as well as Lazarus from the source tarballs on
> my FreeBSD 6.1 system. I would like to be able to cross-compile to
> both Linux and to Windows.
>
> I have read the wik
Greetings to the List:
I installed FPC-2.0.2 as well as Lazarus from the source tarballs on
my FreeBSD 6.1 system. I would like to be able to cross-compile to
both Linux and to Windows.
I have read the wiki at:
http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/index.php/Cross_compiling_for_Win32_under_Linux
an
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
> It should be in a good shape, what's needed is a maintainer who's
> building releases, handling/testing bug reports etc. Simply the annoying
> work nobody wants to do :)
OK, so if I were to get the last binary release (2.0.0?) I should be able to
bootstrap to 2.0.2. I
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> What needs to be done to revitalise FPC on SPARC? Without wanting to commit
> myself since I've already got more work than I can cope with is it something
> that somebody who is neither a core FPC developer nor a RISC guru can help
> with?
>
It should be in a good shap
What needs to be done to revitalise FPC on SPARC? Without wanting to commit
myself since I've already got more work than I can cope with is it something
that somebody who is neither a core FPC developer nor a RISC guru can help with?
--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk
[Opini
On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 09:50 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, J.L. Blom wrote:
>
> It is not put in the snapshot packages, this is normal.
> If you want fp, you'll have to compile it yourself, or
> try the release candidate for 2.0.4.
>
> Michael.
Michael,
Thanks a lot
Rainer Stratmann skrev:
> Am Freitag, 21. Juli 2006 20:00 schrieb Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho:
>> AFAIK the solution to easely install a software on Linux is to use the
>> native packages, like .rpm and .deb
>
> The solution for fpc at this moment is quite ok. It does not have to be
> graphical.
On Sat, 22 Jul 2006, J.L. Blom wrote:
> Hi,
> I have some trouble with fpc on my AMD64 (FC5). I have installed
> everything but fp (the IDE) is missing. Looking in the contents of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (using smart) fp is not available. Is it
> possible that it is missing or is it purposely not p
Hi,
I have some trouble with fpc on my AMD64 (FC5). I have installed
everything but fp (the IDE) is missing. Looking in the contents of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (using smart) fp is not available. Is it
possible that it is missing or is it purposely not put in the package.
Joep
_
10 matches
Mail list logo