On 3 Jul 06, at 2:39, Anders Jansson wrote:
> I am making a DOS program that uses RS232 at 115200 bps with
> XON/XOFF. There are some fairly simple public domain units for
> real mode. But in protected mode it seems very complicated. Has
> someone used Elecom? Could a real-mode ISR be used?
You c
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
On 7/2/06, Alain Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question - 2 :
Is there a special Lazarus version for AMD64 ? Does it work on AMD64 ?
Please test! =) There is no pre-compiled binary for download, that´s
for sure, but this may be because there is no mai
On Monday 03 July 2006 06.06, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 7/2/06, Martin Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Screenshots:
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=165409
>
> The assembler window is quite impressive!
Most work is done by GDB. Next on assemble
On 7/2/06, Martin Schreiber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Screenshots:
http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=165409
The assembler window is quite impressive!
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.
On 7/2/06, Alain Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Question - 1:
Once I have installed the module: fpc-2.0.2.x86_64-linux.tar then does
that means that I use the "regular" source code: fpc-2.0.2.source.tar.gz
in order to recompile FPC or to compile lazarus?
I think that you need to install fp
> Has someone used Elecom? Could a real-mode ISR be used?
I don't know anything about real mode.. But a good example of EleCom's
usage can be found in MannDoor.. Available from http://www.randm.ca
Of course, the EleBBS source makes heavy use of EleCom as well, but I
cant find the download link to
I am making a DOS program that uses RS232 at 115200 bps with XON/XOFF. There
are some fairly simple public domain units for real mode. But in protected mode
it seems very complicated. Has someone used Elecom? Could a real-mode ISR be
used?
Kind regards,
Anders
Hi,
I wanted to install fpc/laz on a friend's AMD64 myself a fey days ago
in order to show the "power of FPC" but I realized quickly that AMD64 is
a different "animal".
I can not answer any of your questions as I am not a developer.
However I can say that there are as many platform to suppor
> Please post the complete code.
Here goes (Typed from my Linux box, as i don't have filesharing going
there):
< Start Unit1
Unit unit1;
{$mode objfpc}{$H+}
Interface
Uses
Classes, SysUtils;
Type
threadtest = class(tthread)
constructor Create;
procedure Execute: override;
End
Could we see the complete code please...
Graeme.
On 7/2/06, Ole J. Røtne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did try to wrap both of the WriteLn() with
EnterCriticalSection/LeaveCriticalSection.
Same result..
--
There's no place like 127.0.0.1
___
fpc-pasc
Ole J. Røtne wrote:
>
>
>> -Opprinnelig melding-
>> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av
>> Florian Klaempfl
>> Sendt: 2. juli 2006 12:46
>> Til: FPC-Pascal users discussions
>> Emne: Re: [fpc-pascal] writeln in threads on linux
>>
>>> And if this is a "wrong
> -Opprinnelig melding-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne av
> Florian Klaempfl
> Sendt: 2. juli 2006 12:46
> Til: FPC-Pascal users discussions
> Emne: Re: [fpc-pascal] writeln in threads on linux
>
> > And if this is a "wrong way" of doing this thing, coul
Hi,
I recently retrieved fpc-pascal 2.0.2a from the Lazarus download site
together with Lazarus 0.9.16.
System: AMD64 1 Gb mem. sufficient disk space, Linux 2.6.17-1.2139_FC5.
My problems:
1.
Starting "fp" freezes the terminal window. When I do "fp &", the window
is accessible but the first keystro
On 7/2/06, Antal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So just look out for this in the source-code.
Or just use
write('Main Loop',#13#10);
:^)
Isn´t it better to use:
write('Main Loop',LineEnding);
this way the RTL will substitue LineEnding with the appropriate one
for that platform.
--
Felipe Monteir
Ole J. Røtne wrote:
>
> Can anyone explain why i get output like this in a small test program:
> Inside Thread
>Main Loop
> Inside Thread
>Main Loop
> Inside Thread
>Main Loop
>
>
> On Windows the output are lined up just as I would expect:
> Insi
> > Can anyone explain why i get output like this in a small
> test program:
> > Inside Thread
> > Main Loop
> > Inside Thread
> > Main Loop
> > Inside Thread
> > Main Loop
> That's because the line terminator!
> #10#13 or #13#10 acts differently
> So, check
Can anyone explain why i get output like this in a small test program:
Inside Thread
Main Loop
Inside Thread
Main Loop
Inside Thread
Main Loop
That's because the line terminator!
#10#13 or #13#10 acts differently
So, check in the source code whic
Can anyone explain why i get output like this in a small test program:
Inside Thread
Main Loop
Inside Thread
Main Loop
Inside Thread
Main Loop
On Windows the output are lined up just as I would expect:
Inside Thread
Main Loop
Inside Thread
Main
Version 0.9 of MSEide+MSEgui is released:
http://mypage.bluewin.ch/msegui/
Screenshots:
http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=165409
Have a lot of fun!
Martin
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.
19 matches
Mail list logo