[ Charset ISO-8859-15 unsupported, converting... ]
> Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 01:05 schrieb Alain Michaud:
> > Hi,
> >
> > would someone know how to execute: spin_lock spin_lock_init and
> > spin_unlock
> >
> > I just want to disable the interrupts for 200 miliseconds maximum!
> > This is not too
Tony Pelton schreef:
On 5/29/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Use a IDE with code tools that support find declaration.
that is a terrible answer.
this isn't the "IDE" list, it is the Free Pascal "compiler" list.
Indeed. But sometimes the compiler doesn't give enough informa
Am Dienstag, 30. Mai 2006 01:05 schrieb Alain Michaud:
> Hi,
>
> would someone know how to execute: spin_lock spin_lock_init and
> spin_unlock
>
> I just want to disable the interrupts for 200 miliseconds maximum!
> This is not too long and hopefuly, my system will not crash...
Well, 200 ms is abo
On 5/29/06, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Use a IDE with code tools that support find declaration.
that is a terrible answer.
this isn't the "IDE" list, it is the Free Pascal "compiler" list.
i would have beat my head against a wall for days on a problem like that.
i would sug
Hi,
would someone know how to execute: spin_lock spin_lock_init and
spin_unlock
I just want to disable the interrupts for 200 miliseconds maximum! This
is not too long and hopefuly, my system will not crash...
Does someone has any experience with this kind of situation.
Sincerely
Alain Mic
Am Montag, den 29.05.2006, 23:30 +0200 schrieb Burkhard Carstens:
> Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 22:47 schrieb Marc Santhoff:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on FreeBSD I use fpOpen, fpIoctl, etc. to drive some generic device.
> > In my porting efforts to win32 I have found the more generic
> > FileOpen, but no equival
On 5/29/06, Alain Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wanted to write a unit that would simulate this file (ioctl.h), but,
this header file contains mainly macros. I do not think that it is
possible to write some Pascal code that would in fact be a macro! If
someone knows if it possible to write
Alain Michaud wrote:
> In the mean time, I calculate the function number "by hand", knowing the
> device number, function number, IO_RW, etc... Or if I use a precedure do
> do this, then this will slow the program down.
AFAIK, these numbers are mostly constants, so you need to do this work
only on
Am Montag, 29. Mai 2006 22:47 schrieb Marc Santhoff:
> Hi,
>
> on FreeBSD I use fpOpen, fpIoctl, etc. to drive some generic device.
> In my porting efforts to win32 I have found the more generic
> FileOpen, but no equivalent of fpIoctl or it's underlying unix system
> call ioctl().
>
> An old win32
On 29 May 2006, at 23:09, Alain Michaud wrote:
In the mean time, I calculate the function number "by hand",
knowing the
device number, function number, IO_RW, etc... Or if I use a
precedure do
do this, then this will slow the program down.
It should be no problem to use (inline or not)fun
Hi,
I use FpIOctl from "BaseUnix" . My platform is Linux. I do FpOpen then
FpIOCTL. It works!
However:
The kernel 2.6 has a new naming convention for the function number. See
the file: asm/ioctl.h
This file contains many constants and the final call number is assembled
from the direction type,
Hi,
on FreeBSD I use fpOpen, fpIoctl, etc. to drive some generic device. In
my porting efforts to win32 I have found the more generic FileOpen, but
no equivalent of fpIoctl or it's underlying unix system call ioctl().
An old win32.hlp told me Windows has "DeviceIoCtl()", but I'm not really
sure i
> > While compiler gives a hint about "true" declaration, it does not point to
> > the problematic unit.
> Use a IDE with code tools that support find declaration.
> In your case Lazarus would for example have jumped to an include file that
> that
> contains the wrong declaration. Search include
Пётр Косаревский schreef:
The problem is that Apple's universal interfaces also include a
"round" function, which returns a real instead of an integral type.
How can one find such a thing himself without trial&error?
Some time ago I had a similar problem with "bool DeleteFile(PChar)" functi
> The problem is that Apple's universal interfaces also include a
> "round" function, which returns a real instead of an integral type.
How can one find such a thing himself without trial&error?
Some time ago I had a similar problem with "bool DeleteFile(PChar)" function in
Windows API and s
On 29 mei 2006, at 14:46, Thomas Miller wrote:
I am frustrated by a very simple problem. I am trying to convert
real to integer, using free pascal for mac. I am an old Think
Pascal user who just recently found free pascal and, while thrilled
to have a pascal compiler for mac OSX, I am s
Thomas Miller schreef:
I am frustrated by a very simple problem. I am trying to convert real
to integer, using free pascal for mac. I am an old Think Pascal user
who just recently found free pascal and, while thrilled to have a pascal
compiler for mac OSX, I am still a bit lost. In Think Pa
Hi,
since I know fpc has a code generator for ARM CPUs and is running on
FreeBSD I'd like to know:
What would be needed to make the compiled programm run on FreeBSD for
ARM?
If there is some real porting work to do (as an opposite of
"re-configuration"), how much time may that take?
The FreeBSD
I am frustrated by a very simple problem. I am trying to convert
real to integer, using free pascal for mac. I am an old Think Pascal
user who just recently found free pascal and, while thrilled to have
a pascal compiler for mac OSX, I am still a bit lost. In Think
Pascal, I would have
19 matches
Mail list logo
