Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC on NetBSD (i386)

2006-04-21 Thread Adrian Maier
( i'm re-posting. My answer got rejected bacause gmail's smtp is blacklisted as spam *again* . very annoying ) On 4/19/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It depends. If you get 2.0 running, there's probably not that much > you have to change to your patches to get 2.0.2 and 2.1.1 ru

Re: [fpc-pascal] FPC on NetBSD (i386)

2006-04-21 Thread Adrian Maier
On 4/19/06, Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It depends. If you get 2.0 running, there's probably not that much > you have to change to your patches to get 2.0.2 and 2.1.1 running as > wel. The downside is that you have to download the 2.0 sources. The > upside is that you don't have to m

[fpc-pascal] fpc + linux, problem with VarArrayCreate, variant

2006-04-21 Thread Ryszard Kadow
helllo!     Variable V is variant type, in first step V must be  array type (V := VarArrayCreate)in second step type varBYte.   In delphi and lazarus everything is ok.   in  fpc 2.0.2 (linux) program show  error  EVariantInvalidOpError.   See example below.   where is error?   ==

Re: [fpc-pascal] x86_64-win64

2006-04-21 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Bisma Jayadi wrote: >> People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a >> lot of >> changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first >> x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS >> compiler >> for win64. > > Is there any publicat

Re: [fpc-pascal] x86_64-win64

2006-04-21 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, constantijnw wrote: Michael Van Canneyt wrote: http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit And of course the documentation: http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html more specificall