People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot of
changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS compiler
for win64.
Is there any publication page about this, on the wiki or fpc
constantijnw wrote:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> constantijnw wrote:
>>
>>> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>>
> http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
>
>
>
And of course the document
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.ht
constantijnw wrote:
> Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
>>>
>>>
>>
>> And of course the documentation:
>>
>> http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
>>
>> more speci
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
http://www.freepascal.org/wiki/index.php/Writing_portable_code_regarding_the_processor_architecture#32_Bit_vs._64_Bit
And of course the documentation:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/prog/prog.html
more specifically:
http://www.freepascal.org/docs-html/p
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> constantijnw wrote:
> > Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> >> constantijnw wrote:
> >>
> >>> Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
> >>> between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
> >>>
> >>
> >> What do y
constantijnw wrote:
> Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>> constantijnw wrote:
>>
>>> Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
>>> between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
>>>
>>
>> What do you mean with this?
>>
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
constantijnw wrote:
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@list
constantijnw wrote:
> Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
> between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
What do you mean with this?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.fr
Congratulations! Is a new compiler define planned which distinguishes
between 32 and 64 bits, irrespective of the os targeted?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Eugene Mayevski wrote:
> FK> It is far from being ready for production use, but for first tests it
> should
> FK> be
> FK> usefull.
>
> What are the main issues to be aware of when building the code with this
> version?
Unknown yet, that's why this snapshot is available: to find out these
issues
Hello!
You (Florian Klaempfl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote about "[fpc-pascal] x86_64-win64" on mm/dd/ at hh:nn:
FK> People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot
of
FK> changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
FK> x86_64-win64 snapsho
People following the svn changes recently might have noticed that a lot of
changes regarding win64 happened. So we're proud to announce the first
x86_64-win64 snapshot which is also probably the first available OSS compiler
for win64.
ftp://ftpmaster.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v21/x86_64-win6
> -Fu/home/fpc/packages/base/*/units/$fpctarget
>
> Recursive is too error prone and therefor not usefull
thanx to all who replied, that's what I was looking for, not true recursive,
just
wildcards
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepasca
2006/4/20, Vinzent Hoefler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:32, L505 wrote:
>
> > I didn't say pure pascal programmers with no other skills.
>
> Of course you didn't say *that*. But it still sounds like you are very
> focused on language skills. Language skills are much less imp
On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:32, L505 wrote:
> I didn't say pure pascal programmers with no other skills.
Of course you didn't say *that*. But it still sounds like you are very
focused on language skills. Language skills are much less important
than people usually think.
> most
> pascal progr
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, darekM wrote:
Hi
I want to pass directive from command line to fpc.cfg
in fpc.cfg I have something like this
-Fu/home/me/project1/units/$LCL_PLATFORM
and I want to compile my program form command line
fpc -dRELEASE myprogram
how setup $LCL_PLATFORM
in bash:
LCL_
Hi
I want to pass directive from command line to fpc.cfg
in fpc.cfg I have something like this
-Fu/home/me/project1/units/$LCL_PLATFORM
and I want to compile my program form command line
fpc -dRELEASE myprogram
how setup $LCL_PLATFORM
Darek
_
On 20 apr 2006, at 01:56, L wrote:
-Fu/home/me/project1/units/*.*
No such thing for FPC, right? Recursive units searches?
Have a look at the standard /etc/fpc.cfg and you'll see things like
-Fu/usr/local/lib/fpc/$fpcversion/units/$fpctarget
-Fu/usr/local/lib/fpc/$fpcversion/units/$fpctarget
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Jeff Miller wrote:
3. speed - not a big deal. Hardware cheap enough.
Speed definitely does matter for some apps: application servers,
database servers etc. So you can't generalize this.
I'll have to agree with the second comment, not the first.
I use fpc for statis
20 matches
Mail list logo
