Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Bisma Jayadi wrote: >> Delphi 2006 for Win32 also incorperates a lot of the innovations nade in >> Delphi.Net. > > .Net? Though I had suggested FPC to also implement some new Delphi > language features which I think very usefull, but I agree with FPC core > team that we don't need to support .Net

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Bisma Jayadi
Delphi 2006 for Win32 also incorperates a lot of the innovations nade in Delphi.Net. .Net? Though I had suggested FPC to also implement some new Delphi language features which I think very usefull, but I agree with FPC core team that we don't need to support .Net yet. IMO, .Net is just a bus

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: OpenDelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Mattias Gaertner
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:57:23 -0800 (PST) > > > --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:19:36 +0700 > > From: Bisma Jayadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org > > To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [fpc-pascal] Re: OpenDelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread L505
> FPC is Ok but a few years ago I examined Lazarus > codebase and I saw Lazarus is hacking Class parents > on-the-fly for its normal operations so I immediately > lost my interest. > Is this changed recently? What do you mean hacking class parents? What I noticed was tons and tons of abstraction

[fpc-pascal] Re: OpenDelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread G�khan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:19:36 +0700 > From: Bisma Jayadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org > To: fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; > format=flowe

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
With 22.000 dolares we could have, in less then a year: * PalmOS support for Free Pascal and Lazarus * A great Carbon widgetset * Perhaps even full COM and OLE support -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepas

Re: [fpc-pascal] WinSock

2006-03-15 Thread Tony Pelton
On 3/15/06, Bob Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have fpc-2.0.2 running on Linux WinSock = "Windows Sockets" <> Linux Sockets ? You might want to look at some of the abstraction libs available, such as Synapse. also, and i'm not sure about this, as i've been meaning to ask, but i think t

[fpc-pascal] WinSock

2006-03-15 Thread Bob Richards
Can someone point me to the documentation for the winsock unit? It doesn't appear to exist in the html docs, nor in the pdf doc either. A google search turned up nothing. The unit exists in the source tree, I have it installed, but where is the doc?? I have fpc-2.0.2 running on Linux, and have

Re: [fpc-pascal] problem compiling svn-fpc for arm-linux

2006-03-15 Thread Koenraad Lelong
Peter Vreman schreef: More specific, the error-lines point to the @object construct. Is there any way I can avoid these errors ? I used revision 2898 of fpc. My arm-linux-as is version 2.14. Use the latest binutils 2.16.1 I downloaded and compiled them from http://www.gnuarm.com, then compile

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Mark Andrews
They haven't raised any money yet. The money will only be collected if Borland were to accept an offer from these folks. The amount so far is more akin to pledges. Mark L505 wrote: Who gets the $22,000 they have raised so far, if their plan doesn't work out? ___

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread L505
Who gets the $22,000 they have raised so far, if their plan doesn't work out? ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
> You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but > not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net compiler alone, and the VCL (full VCL), and > defacto support for all (not just a subset) of Delphi features. The idea is that it´s much, much cheapier to invest on Lazarus and Free Pascal an

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > http://delphi.org/ > > > > Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p > > Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p > > You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but > not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net compiler alon

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Rodrigo Palhano
What he meant is that supporting fpc/lazarus development is a quite more tangible task than trying to buy and support delphi. On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:54:38 -0300, memsom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://delphi.org/ Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p Why don't the

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Florian Klaempfl
memsom wrote: >> http://delphi.org/ >> >> Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p >> Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p > > You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but > not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net com

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread memsom
> http://delphi.org/ > > Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p > Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p You're kidding me right? Maybe if you made that assertion about Kylix, but not Delphi!! The Delphi.Net compiler alone, and the VCL

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Marco van de Voort
> http://delphi.org/ > > Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p > Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p And totally unrealistic. - price is way to low (50 times that is more reasonable I think) - not just the source is not for sale,

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Bisma Jayadi
> http://delphi.org/ Sorry... stupid mistypo. :P It should be: http://opendelphi.org/ :D -Bee- has Bee.ography at http://beeography.wordpress.com Bisma Jayadi wrote: Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead o

Re: [fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Graeme Geldenhuys
I fully agree!!! Regards, - Graeme - On 3/15/06, Bisma Jayadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://delphi.org/ > > Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p > Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p > > -Bee- > > has Bee.ography at > h

[fpc-pascal] opendelphi.org

2006-03-15 Thread Bisma Jayadi
http://delphi.org/ Very nice attempts, but -IMO- they're just wasting their time. :p Why don't they switch to and support FPC/Lazarus instead of doing that? :p -Bee- has Bee.ography at http://beeography.wordpress.com ___ fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa

Re: [fpc-pascal] TProcess and EProcess

2006-03-15 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Adrian Maier wrote: Hello, I am trying to catch the possible exceptions that may ocur when executing processes with TProcess (such as cases when the program doesn't exist or is not in the path). try p := TProcess.Create(nil); p.CommandLine := 'psql'; p.O

[fpc-pascal] TProcess and EProcess

2006-03-15 Thread Adrian Maier
Hello, I am trying to catch the possible exceptions that may ocur when executing processes with TProcess (such as cases when the program doesn't exist or is not in the path). try p := TProcess.Create(nil); p.CommandLine := 'psql'; p.Options := p.Options + [poStderrToOutPut,po