On Thursday 09 March 2006 17:47, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> On 9 mrt 2006, at 18:38, Vincent Snijders wrote:
> >
> > Indeed, it isn't a real random number generator and in fact this is
> > a good thing, otherwise you wouldn't be able to reproduce any
> > behaviour with a Pseudo RNG. The fact it is Pseudo
Maybe someday we'll have TDatasetProviver + TClientDataset :)
Thanks for your quick answers Michael!
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.free
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
> Is there any chance we have a TDatasetProvider like implementation
> in FPC ?
Midware contains such a thing.
I would very much like to have TDatasetProvider and TClientDataset
in FPC, but I have currently no time to implement it.
There is a freewar
Is there any chance we have a TDatasetProvider like implementation
in FPC ?
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:16:40 -0300, Michael Van Canneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
Is there any way (components, classes) i can develop
3-tier (n-tier...) application i
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
> Is there any way (components, classes) i can develop
> 3-tier (n-tier...) application in FPC ??
ICS and probably also Midware compile with FPC.
You can use that to create N-tier apps.
Michael.
___
fpc-pa
Is there any way (components, classes) i can develop
3-tier (n-tier...) application in FPC ??
tks
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepas
That's really cool, i am starting to love fpc... :)
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 16:37:18 -0300, Michael Van Canneyt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:58, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:53:34 -0300, Jonas Maebe
> <[EMAIL PROT
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:58, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:53:34 -0300, Jonas Maebe
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:34, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
> >>
> >>> Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delp
Hi,
I finally managed to install fpc and lazarus from svn-source on a linux
box (suse10.0 / i686).
Now, as the first "hello world" app is running, I'd like to
cross-compile it for windows and as many other platforms as possible.
So I got fpcbuild/ from svn, started playing with the fpcbuild/in
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:58, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:53:34 -0300, Jonas Maebe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:34, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delphi ?
Yes.
Why is that ?
Because Delph
On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:58, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:53:34 -0300, Jonas Maebe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:34, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delphi ?
Yes.
Why is that ?
Because Delphi also does it and beca
Why is that ? Is there anyway i could deactivate this ref count feature?
On Thu, 09 Mar 2006 15:53:34 -0300, Jonas Maebe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:34, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delphi ?
Yes.
Jonas
_
On 9 mrt 2006, at 19:34, Rodrigo Palhano wrote:
Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delphi ?
Yes.
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
Are interfaces in FPC reference counted like in Delphi ?
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
On 9 mrt 2006, at 18:38, Vincent Snijders wrote:
As I noticed, when initialized the randseed with the same value,
the whole rand values in the chain will be totally identical,
which I'm afraid is rather far from what we might expect from a
"real" random number generator!
Indeed, it isn't
Antal wrote:
As I noticed, when initialized the randseed with the same value, the
whole rand values in the chain will be totally identical, which I'm
afraid is rather far from what we might expect from a "real" random
number generator!
Indeed, it isn't a real random number generator and in fa
There is nothing strange about this. Randomize initialises randseed
based on the system clock value expressed in seconds. So if you run
it twice in the same second, you will get the same number.
You are not generating a series of random numbers based on the
Mersenne Twister here, because you only
On Thursday 09 March 2006 17:02, L505 wrote:
> > > Isn't this exactly what array of const is for? It allows you to
> > > use anywhere from 1 to unlimited parameters.
> >
> > Yes. Still, it's only one argument. You can't just suddenly pass
> > two "array of const", can you?
>
> Okay but why would yo
I don't see what all the arguments are about the C language being able to
rewrite writeln (printf, etc.) but in Pascal not. I don't see any limits with
what Pascal can do - you could rewrite writeln procedure and other low level
calls with several options - textrec tricks, or this array of const t
> > Isn't this exactly what array of const is for? It allows you to use
> > anywhere from 1 to unlimited parameters.
>
> Yes. Still, it's only one argument. You can't just suddenly pass two
> "array of const", can you?
Okay but why would you need that (humor me).
>
>
> Vin"Nitpicker"zent.
>
On Thursday 09 March 2006 16:23, L505 wrote:
> Well you are nitpicking my email :-).
Maybe. I'm known for doing that sometimes. I also even tend to write
"SizeOf (byte)" instead of "1".
> I'm not confused at all - the docs are.
Are they?
"My" Free Pascal: Reference Guide states:
|10.3.6 Arr
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, L505 wrote:
I have also read people stating things like this before:
"you can use array of const but you can't make functions like writeln
because writeln accepts multiple types".
Usually the statement is about different _numbers_ of arguments, not
different types. Writi
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Van Canneyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "FPC-Pascal users discussions"
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Variable arguments, different types?
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, L505 wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >>
> >>> I have also read peopl
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006, L505 wrote:
I have also read people stating things like this before:
"you can use array of const but you can't make functions like writeln
because writeln accepts multiple types".
Usually the statement is about different _numbers_ of arguments, not
different types.
>
> > I have also read people stating things like this before:
> >
> > "you can use array of const but you can't make functions like writeln
> > because writeln accepts multiple types".
>
> Usually the statement is about different _numbers_ of arguments, not
> different types. Writing subroutine
I would
like to announce the startup of the project "OpSim" (the Open source Process
Simulator).
This
project regards an open source based Chemical Engineering Process Simulator
with a user friendly (drag-drop) graphical user interface (GUI) and an
underlying high performance simulation engine.
On Thursday 09 March 2006 04:31, L505 wrote:
> I have also read people stating things like this before:
>
> "you can use array of const but you can't make functions like writeln
> because writeln accepts multiple types".
Usually the statement is about different _numbers_ of arguments, not
differ
27 matches
Mail list logo
