Hi,
Does anyone have a copy of Quake 2?
I got Quake to compile with freepascal, but I don't have the quake game files.
I need it, in order to test the exe! Otherwise, the exe is useless.
So if anyone has a copy of Quake 2, maybe you will you test the FreePascal
Quake port
for me?
All that need
>>Intel mode isn't supported yet on x86_64
> When do you expect it to be?
It is not planned. Unless a user supplies the required patches for the
compiler there will not be an intel like asmmode for amd64 anytime soon.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-p
Am Samstag, den 17.12.2005, 18:23 +0200 schrieb Ziegenhorn Tourism
Database:
> Some weeks ago I switched from 1.0.x to 2.0.0.
>
> Well, a lot of work to eleminate "oldlinux", but it
> works fine. I updated to 2.0.2 and something happend:
>
> I have some cgi-programs for a virtual FreeBSD 4.7 Serv
On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> On 12/16/05, Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > C++ headers are near useless, when you want to use fpc.
>
> What about java. Is is easier to translate?
>
> I still don´t get it why you guys think it is so hard to translate
On Sat, 17 Dec 2005, Mihai wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any simple TUI framework or RAD tool for Free Pascal?
> I mean simpler than FV which is quite big for small console apps
> with simple widgets (Linux console).
Try ocrt in packages/extra/ncurses.
It's object oriented, but much simpler th
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Intel mode isn't supported yet on x86_64
When do you expect it to be?
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal
>> I compiled fpc from the sources from the svn repository today, but the
>> results are almost the same as I posted yesterday (I marked with **
>> where the results have changed):
>>
>> Test1:
>> ** fpc (standard MM): 3.0 sec - factor = 1.30
>> fpc (FastMM4): 2.9 sec - factor = 1.30
>> delphi (s
> Well, a lot of work to eleminate "oldlinux", but it
> works fine. I updated to 2.0.2 and something happend:
>
> I have some cgi-programs for a virtual FreeBSD 4.7 Server.
> I compile under Linux (SuSE 8.2), tranfer the executable
> to FreeBSD and do a "brandelf -t Linux prog-name"
>
> This work
> I tried to modify the FastMM4 to work with with fpc.
> I had no big problems for the non-assembly language version, but with
> the assembly language version i have the problem, that fpc is allways
> generating a stack frame, even if i use the {$STACKFRAMES OFF} directive.
>
> Is it not possible a
> I have a command line utility that would really benefit from
> command line editing... is there a simple way to add this
> kind of readline-like behavior to a FreePascal program?
> I would appreciate the functionality on Linux but I might
> also use the program on Windows.
This works for Linux
> Hi,
>
> I have changed the FastMM4 that it seemd to work with fpc now. Here are
> the results of my prior tests now with FastMM4 for fpc:
>
> Test1:
> fpc (standard MM): 3.1 sec - factor = 1.34
> fpc (FastMM4): 3.0 sec - factor = 1.30
> delphi (standard MM): 3.1 sec - factor = 1.34
> de
> Hi,
>
> I have changed the FastMM4 that it seemd to work with fpc now. Here are
> the results of my prior tests now with FastMM4 for fpc:
>
> Test1:
> fpc (standard MM): 3.1 sec - factor = 1.34
> fpc (FastMM4): 3.0 sec - factor = 1.30
> delphi (standard MM): 3.1 sec - factor = 1.34
> de
Hello,
Is there any simple TUI framework or RAD tool for Free Pascal?
I mean simpler than FV which is quite big for small console apps
with simple widgets (Linux console).
Thank you very much,
Mihai
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pascal@lists.freepasca
13 matches
Mail list logo
