On 6 okt 2005, at 19:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got the point, but there's still something wrong as I've tried the
following
code but the parser claims for an identifier instead ';' at the
third line:
(I'm using FPC 2.0.0: could it matter?)
Yes, support for MacPas style objects is only
>-- Messaggio Originale --
>From: Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal] Migrating MW objects definitions
>Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 15:01:56 +0200
>To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
>Reply-To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
>
>
>
>On 6 okt 2005, at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
On 6 okt 2005, at 17:16, Ivan Shikhalev wrote:
You have to use a forward declaration:
[skip]
AFAIK, this is impossible for static objects (object-types) as
record-types too. It is needed to use class-types or pointers to
object-types.
We are talking about MacPas mode. MacPas objects ar
-Original Message-
From: Jonas Maebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> You have to use a forward declaration:
>
[skip]
AFAIK, this is impossible for static objects (object-types) as record-types
too. It is needed to use class-types or pointers to object-types.
_
On 6 okt 2005, at 14:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to migrate MW OO code to FPC. I'm in trouble with this
piece of
MW code:
type
myObjectA = object
.
lObj: myObjectB;
...
end;
type
myObjectB = object
...
lObj: myObjectA
...
end;
Essentially when the compiler tries to deal wit
> I'm trying to migrate MW OO code to FPC. I'm in trouble with this piece of
> MW code:
>
> type
> myObjectA = object
> .
> lObj: myObjectB;
> ...
> end;
>
> type
> myObjectB = object
> ...
> lObj: myObjectA
> ...
> end;
>
> Essentially when the compiler tries to deal with myObjectA, it says th
I'm trying to migrate MW OO code to FPC. I'm in trouble with this piece of
MW code:
type
myObjectA = object
.
lObj: myObjectB;
...
end;
type
myObjectB = object
...
lObj: myObjectA
...
end;
Essentially when the compiler tries to deal with myObjectA, it says that
'myObjectB is not defined'.
A
