On 22 Sep 2005, at 12:24, Carsten Bager wrote:
It says in the manual that:
$B or $BOOLEVAL : Complete boolean evaluation
This switch is understood by the Free Pascal compiler, but is
ignored. The compiler always uses shortcut evaluation.
This is outdated. 2.0 includes supports complete boo
> Semaphores <> Mutexes. Semaphores do not always have names and are not
> system-wide.
In my experience, its the other way round. Semaphores are system wide/cross
process. Admittedly, they are not always named though.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - fpc-pa
> > How can I also do it in linux?
>
> Use semaphores. There is a semaphore implementation for LINUX, Windows, BeOS
> and probably most other Unices. Certainly, any platform that conforms to
> POSIX and/or PThreads will have a semaphore implementation.
>
> The mechanics will be different - the id
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005 17:16:36 +0100
"Matt Emson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How can I also do it in linux?
>
> Use semaphores. There is a semaphore implementation for LINUX, Windows, BeOS
Semaphores <> Mutexes. Semaphores do not always have names and are not
system-wide.
Micha
__
> How can I also do it in linux?
Use semaphores. There is a semaphore implementation for LINUX, Windows, BeOS
and probably most other Unices. Certainly, any platform that conforms to
POSIX and/or PThreads will have a semaphore implementation.
The mechanics will be different - the idea will be uni
Hi Alexey,
thank you for your answer, I'm thinking about some portable solution for
win32 and linux?
How can I also do it in linux?
tia!
best regards
> -Mensaje original-
> De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de
> Alexey Pavluchenko
> Enviado el: viernes, 23 de
Hello Jose,
Thursday, September 22, 2005, 1:20:48 PM, you wrote:
JP> How can avoid to run my program more than once?
I suppose you wanted to ask "how can I allow only one instance of my
program running under Win32". Correct me if I'm wrong. If I'm right,
then you may do it like this: check for n
