Re: [fpc-pascal] Extending FPDoc

2005-09-17 Thread Sebastian Günther
Michael Van Canneyt schrieb: > > I'm not yet convinced that having a DB backend to FPDoc will be so trivial, > but if you think it's easy to do: I'm all for it :-) Okay. I'll try to have a look on this within the next days. At the moment we have a state of emergency, as Oktoberfest just startet ;

Re: [fpc-pascal] Porter Stemming for FPC 2.0

2005-09-17 Thread Elio Cuevas Gómez
El Vie 16 Sep 2005 21:06, Lance Boyle escribió: > This is very interesting. I've always wondered if anyone did this on > purpose, and I've always wondered what the big deal is with just > adding array range checking to C. A company with tons of internal > software development, and whose existence i

[fpc-pascal] Recompiling with debug (was: fpc 2.0 and DOM/xml under OS/2 gives me "Processterminated by SIGSEGV")

2005-09-17 Thread Søren Ager
On 15-09-05 23.08, Tomas Hajny wrote: Alternatively, it would be possible to build the whole thing Well I actually ended up recompiling the compiler as well. But is will not build the fcl with debug info now (works without debug info): Free Pascal Compiler version 2.1.1 [2005/09/15] for i38

Re: [fpc-pascal] Extending FPDoc

2005-09-17 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Florian Klämpfl wrote: > Sebastian Günther wrote: > > Florian Klämpfl schrieb: > > > > > I would prefer to profile the xml reader and see if we can improve it. > > > > > > Yes, but I don't see this mutually exclusive :) > > Can somebody send me profiler output? Or how ca

Re: [fpc-pascal] Extending FPDoc

2005-09-17 Thread Florian Klämpfl
Sebastian Günther wrote: Florian Klämpfl schrieb: I would prefer to profile the xml reader and see if we can improve it. Yes, but I don't see this mutually exclusive :) Can somebody send me profiler output? Or how can it be reproduced? ___ fpc-pa