Date sent: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:01:38 +0200
From: Sřren Ager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: FPC-Pascal users discussions
Subject:Re: [fpc-pascal] fpc 2.0 and DOM/xml under OS/2 gives
me "Process
terminated by SIGSEGV"
Send reply
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
> Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote:
>> Sorry, but it isn't.
>>
>> I downloaded the newest snapshot (compiler and rtl) with date
>> 9.9.05.
>>
>> The error still exists.
> c:\fpc>c:\fpc\compiler\ppc386 -n -Fuc:\fpc\rtl\units\i386-win32
> test.pas -l Free Pascal Compiler v
Thomas Zastrow schrieb:
> You mean xpath.pp???
yes
> Hu, haven't seen that yet ... are there any
> documentation / examples for using XPath?
not really, as it follows the official W3C specification quite closely
Regards,
Sebastian
___
fpc-pascal mai
On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 02:26:02PM +0200, Tom Verhoeff wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 07:12:37PM +0200, Jonas Maebe wrote:
> >
> > On 07 Sep 2005, at 17:13, Tom Verhoeff wrote:
> >
> > >At some point in the 1.9 branch, this changed (and now it bites me).
> > >Now it silently assigns 0 to i on t
Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote:
> Luiz Américo wrote:
> > Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote:
>
> >>
> >> at the end of ParamStr(0) there is a wrong character.
> >>
>
> > This is fixed in fpc 2.0.1 or 2.1.1
>
> Sorry, but it isn't.
>
> I downloaded the newest snapshot (compiler and rtl) with date 9.9
> Luiz Am?rico wrote:
> > Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote:
>
> >>
> >> at the end of ParamStr(0) there is a wrong character.
> >>
>
> > This is fixed in fpc 2.0.1 or 2.1.1
>
> Sorry, but it isn't.
>
> I downloaded the newest snapshot (compiler and rtl) with date 9.9.05.
>
> The error still exi
Luiz Américo wrote:
> Hans-Juergen Taenzer wrote:
>>
>> at the end of ParamStr(0) there is a wrong character.
>>
> This is fixed in fpc 2.0.1 or 2.1.1
Sorry, but it isn't.
I downloaded the newest snapshot (compiler and rtl) with date 9.9.05.
The error still exists.
Thanks for your feedb
Roberto Della Pasqua wrote:
> Hi kind users,
>
> I like ask how is the status of FPC64 under linux.
I can tell you what's the developer's opinion.
>
> About:
> - reliability (can be used to build 24x365 system tcp daemons?)
I think so, as long as you don't depend on seldomly used parts of the
