Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-21 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed > for > > the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language. > > > And the assembly language was just magically inserted into the memory > with that magic script? Any device that can enter data via I/O. Pu

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-21 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
L505 wrote: The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed for the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language. And the assembly language was just magically inserted into the memory with that magic script? At some point it comes to a h

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-21 Thread L505
> The first compilers were written in assembly language. This allowed for > the next generation compilers to be written in a high level language. And the assembly language was just magically inserted into the memory with that magic script? At some point it comes to a hardware etching level, I'm

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-21 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
L505 wrote: Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one except using a propritary compiler. But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based? Molecules, Ions, and atoms? i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc.

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-21 Thread Nikolay Nikolov
L505 wrote: Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one except using a propritary compiler. But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based? Molecules, Ions, and atoms? i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc. Th

Re: [fpc-pascal] Linking pthread?

2005-08-21 Thread L505
There is a tip here, you might simply need something like libc6-dev or libc6-devel http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03630.htm l ___ fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-21 Thread L505
> Same applies to gcc ;) Without an older gcc you can't build a new one > except using a propritary compiler. > But where did that proprietary compiler come from? Hardware based? Molecules, Ions, and atoms? i.e. the answer to the big bang theory, the answer to religion, etc. _

Re: [fpc-pascal] Freepascal 2.0 for cygwin

2005-08-21 Thread Florian Klaempfl
Matt Emson wrote: >>Is there some posibility to make (compiling) fpc without fpc? >>Is there some makefile or script in fpc (cvs) to avoid to use a fpc >>1.0.0 or 2.0.0 to create a fpc new version? > > > Cygwin runs exclusively on Windows machines... FPC has a Windows port. > Whilst I can see th

[fpc-pascal] fpc 2.0 and DOM/xml under OS/2 gives me "Process terminated by SIGSEGV"

2005-08-21 Thread Søren Ager
Hi, I have the following snippet of code (which works under Windows): PROGRAM XMLTest; USES Dom, XMLRead; PROCEDURE ProcessItem(Node: TDOMNode); VAR i: Integer; attr: TDOMNode; Title,Desc,Link,pubDate : String; BEGIN Title:=''; Desc:=''; Link:=''; pubDate:=''; WHILE Node<>Nil DO BE

Re: [fpc-pascal] HeapError variable access

2005-08-21 Thread Peter Vreman
At 18:13 20-8-2005, you wrote: Hi, I'm working with a unit someone developed for FPC in 2001. Compiling under FPC 2.0.0, I'm getting the following error... wErrors0.pp(279,23) Error: Identifier not found "HeapError" From this code segment... procedure SetHeapErrorHandle; //=

Re: [fpc-pascal] Linking pthread?

2005-08-21 Thread David Butler
Hi Anton Thanks for the pointers! libpthread was installed under /lib, but for some reason I had to copy libpthread.so.0 to libpthread.so to get ld to see it. Regards David On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 22:21:53 +0200, you wrote: >Hi, > >David Butler wrote: > >>Hi >> >>When I compile an application that