Hi,
On Sunday 31 October 2004 06:14 pm, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> Try to add -Xd
>
Thanks, it does what I need. Did not find this in the manual nor in fpc -h.
*
uses Dl;
*
I managed to compile my qt binding for arm (the library is C/C++ code)
but to test fpc's ca
At 19:12 4-11-2004, you wrote:
Peter wrote:
>The quick fix for it will be to disable the dump_stack call after an
unhandled exception is found.
That gets rid of the junk, but I still lose the call stack.
>Alternative solution is to retrieve the caller stack at the time an
exception is raised. Bu
Peter wrote:
>The quick fix for it will be to disable the dump_stack call after an unhandled
>exception is found.
That gets rid of the junk, but I still lose the call stack.
>Alternative solution is to retrieve the caller stack at the time an exception is
>raised. But that will take more cpu t
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Mark Emerson wrote:
Can anyone give an estimate of how many FPC users there are now,
worldwide? I'm not certain how to define this, but would like to get
a feeling. One metric might be the number of downloads of various
versions. Another might be the size of this email
> Right now I'm downloading the latest stable release 1.0.10 of FPC.
Note that 1.9.x is considered more stable than 1.0.10. It is more beta,
simply because stability requirements have been stepped up.
> Should I download/recompile something additionally to enable
> multi-threading support s
> At 15:15 4-11-2004, you wrote:
> >Can anyone give an estimate of how many FPC users there are now,
> >worldwide? I'm not certain how to define this, but would like to get a
> >feeling. One metric might be the number of downloads of various
> >versions. Another might be the size of this emai
At 15:15 4-11-2004, you wrote:
Can anyone give an estimate of how many FPC users there are now,
worldwide? I'm not certain how to define this, but would like to get a
feeling. One metric might be the number of downloads of various
versions. Another might be the size of this email list. My gr
Mark Emerson wrote:
Can anyone give an estimate of how many FPC users there are now,
worldwide? I'm not certain how to define this, but would like to get a
feeling. One metric might be the number of downloads of various
versions. Another might be the size of this email list. My gratitude
to
Can anyone give an estimate of how many FPC users there are now,
worldwide? I'm not certain how to define this, but would like to get a
feeling. One metric might be the number of downloads of various
versions. Another might be the size of this email list. My gratitude to
the development tea
Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Hello,
Right now I'm downloading the latest stable release 1.0.10 of FPC.
Should I download/recompile something additionally to enable
multi-threading support so that memory management and
exception handling works fine with multi-threaded programs I create?
1.0.10 does
Hello,
Right now I'm downloading the latest stable release 1.0.10 of FPC.
Should I download/recompile something additionally to enable
multi-threading support so that memory management and
exception handling works fine with multi-threaded programs I create?
Additional question: does FPC
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
The first x86-64/linux snapshot has been uploaded.
Maybe I should post a download link as well :) :
ftp://ftp.freepascal.org/pub/fpc/snapshot/v19/linux-x86_64/fpc-1.9.5.x86_64.tar.gz
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ht
The first x86-64/linux snapshot has been uploaded.
As you can see from the regression test results, the compiler is very
stable already:
http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/testsuite.cgi?TESTOS=0&TESTCPU=7&TESTVERSION=0&TESTDATE=
(i386 for comparison:
http://www.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/testsuite.cgi
At 00:04 4-11-2004, you wrote:
Compiling sysutils with -gl gave the call stack seen below... insightful,
I suppose, but not necessarily useful ;)
It definitely points to what Peter said about the ansistring finalize
writing to the same place in the stack. Examining the stack, it seems that
dump
14 matches
Mail list logo
