On 23 okt 2004, at 22:06, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
Thanks to Peter Vreman for Lazarus link. It looks like a helpful
thing. However I wonder about its Mac compatibility - not too much
Mac-related info is there it seems.
It cannot yet generate programs which use the native Mac OS X gui
(Aqua). It can g
Hello Jonas,
Saturday, October 23, 2004, 6:41:59 PM, you wrote:
>> The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
>> programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
JM> I don't know. That depends on whether you have a lot of endian-specific
JM> code, whether you us
On 23 okt 2004, at 15:38, Aleksey Vaneev wrote:
The question is: will moving to Freepascal permit me to compile my
programs for Macintosh platform without severe hassle?
I don't know. That depends on whether you have a lot of endian-specific
code, whether you use much Windows-specific function
At 15:38 23-10-2004, you wrote:
Hello,
I'm currently using Freepascal for Windows mainly, and we even
develop commercial applications with it - so in its state it is
already stable enough for commercial use. Of course I'm grateful to
all FP developers out there.
My business needs advice m
Hello,
I'm currently using Freepascal for Windows mainly, and we even
develop commercial applications with it - so in its state it is
already stable enough for commercial use. Of course I'm grateful to
all FP developers out there.
My business needs advice me to completely switch from De
