Ack! After posting this, I actually read the code and discovered
that the author provided "pure pascal" alternative bits. The unit
compiles without even a warning now. Sorry.
-Alan
--- Alan Mead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Porter stemming is an approximate method for removing
> English-langu
Porter stemming is an approximate method for removing
English-language endings from words ... for example, to match 'happy'
and 'happiness'.
I found a website on tartarus.org that purports to be Porter's
website and has a Delphi 5 implementation of his word stemming
algorithm. But I cannot get
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > single file.
> >
> >
> >>What about optional parameter for $LINKLIB or something like that?
> >
> >
> > {$linklib } can happen multiple times for the same lib in different units.
>
> What about adding a priority parameter: 100 default, 0 low, 200 high; if
> th
Marco van de Voort wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST), Marco van de Voort wrote
I was thinking about a simple global file with libnames and weights,
with a possibility to override on the commandline.
Simple, generic, and configurable.
This doesn't look very transparent to me (another
On Thursday 02 September 2004 16:47, Luis Del Aguila wrote:
> Hola a todos.
> Yo queria hacer algo similar, pero es muy dificil implementarlo.
> Necesito ayuda, yo quiero saber si hay algun libro que enseñe como hacerlo
> Hay algun "mailing list" de freepascal en español.
>
> Gracias
>
> Hi, all
>
> 04-09-03 15.27, skrev Marco van de Voort f?ljande:
> > a possibility to override on the commandline.
> >
> > Simple, generic, and configurable.
>
> Macpas apps also has 2 'main', so the link order matters. I have hardcoded
> it so it always is correct.
>
> Both Metrowerks and Think Pascal also
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST), Marco van de Voort wrote
> > I was thinking about a simple global file with libnames and weights,
> > with a possibility to override on the commandline.
> >
> > Simple, generic, and configurable.
>
> This doesn't look very transparent to me (another pl
04-09-03 15.27, skrev Marco van de Voort följande:
>> On 3 sep 2004, at 14:33, Olle Raab wrote:
>
this for legacy *nix compatibility using an environment variable).
>>>
>>> Can it help by changing the link order ? Or it is not possible wiht a 2
>>> level ns.. ?
>>
>> Hmm, yes, that's proba
Hello,
Jérémie LEFRANCOIS schrieb:
I would be very happy to solve the following problem, any suggestion is welcome.
I work with MS-DOS 6.2, trying to port from TP55 to Freepascal GO32.
There is a terminate stay resident program (for which I have no access to the
sources) that deals with the interfa
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST), Marco van de Voort wrote
> > On 3 sep 2004, at 14:33, Olle Raab wrote:
>
> > >> this for legacy *nix compatibility using an environment variable).
> > >
> > > Can it help by changing the link order ? Or it is not possible wiht a 2
> > > level ns.. ?
> >
>
> On 3 sep 2004, at 14:33, Olle Raab wrote:
> >> this for legacy *nix compatibility using an environment variable).
> >
> > Can it help by changing the link order ? Or it is not possible wiht a 2
> > level ns.. ?
>
> Hmm, yes, that's probably it. The two-level namespace is the reason
> that the
On 3 sep 2004, at 14:33, Olle Raab wrote:
Yes. And for some reason, the linker picks the main of our system unit
to execute instead of the one in libsdl. I don't know on what basis it
does this. The reason it doesn't trigger a duplicate symbol error is
that the Mac OS X linker works with a two-leve
04-09-03 13.12, skrev Jonas Maebe följande:
>
> On 3 sep 2004, at 11:16, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
>
>> Can't you add the SDLMain to the darwin sdl units and let this call
>> main? Or is main defined twice
>> then because the sdllib contains a main?
>
> Yes. And for some reason, the linker picks
On 3 sep 2004, at 11:16, Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Can't you add the SDLMain to the darwin sdl units and let this call
main? Or is main defined twice
then because the sdllib contains a main?
Yes. And for some reason, the linker picks the main of our system unit
to execute instead of the one in libs
04-09-03 10.22, skrev Marco van de Voort följande:
> Typically one starts converting the OS API interface, and then try to get
> bits and pieces from the most similar OS to convert and get working using
> the own API. Startup (entry) code is also always a problem, and new non-unix
> ports might al
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 1 sep 2004, at 00:13, Jeff Weeks wrote:
I tried the SDL4Freepascal headers and they seem to work. Just can't
see how to display text. And they don't appear to work on Macintosh.
JEDI-SDL supposedly works on a "modified" version of Freepascal on a Mac.
Any Mac people out
> At first: Don't get me wrong and expect anything, I'm only curious.
>
> That said:
> How much work would it be to port fpc to another processor?
Peter already did this.
> Same for another OS?
How easy depends on the OS.
Yet another Unix should be pretty easy to do an initial port to (Jonas
Peter Vreman wrote:
Hi,
At first: Don't get me wrong and expect anything, I'm only curious.
That said:
How much work would it be to port fpc to another processor?
Same for another OS?
Maybe some of the experienced folks can give a short sketch in a few
sentences of the process of porting.
Porting
I am currently designing and implementing a macro compiler for the Pascal language. A partial draft of the user manual is available at http://www.pascalmacro.com I invite anyone interested to comment on any aspect of the language or design, such as features, interfaces, compatibility, distri
> > I'd like to try using JEDI-SDL but the directions only tell how to set
> > up the IDE... not how to use the command line compiler under Linux.
> >
> > I'm stumped on a few of them.
> >
> > I condensed the following from the JEDI-SDL Yahoo Group instructions and
> > added what I think the co
> Hi,
>
> At first: Don't get me wrong and expect anything, I'm only curious.
>
> That said:
> How much work would it be to port fpc to another processor?
> Same for another OS?
>
> Maybe some of the experienced folks can give a short sketch in a few
> sentences of the process of porting.
Porting
Hola a todos.
Yo queria hacer algo similar, pero es muy dificil implementarlo.
Necesito ayuda, yo quiero saber si hay algun libro que enseñe como hacerlo
Hay algun "mailing list" de freepascal en español.
Gracias
Hi, all
I would like something similar to this, but it is very dificult
implementati
Hi,
At first: Don't get me wrong and expect anything, I'm only curious.
That said:
How much work would it be to port fpc to another processor?
Same for another OS?
Maybe some of the experienced folks can give a short sketch in a few
sentences of the process of porting.
TIA,
Marc
04-09-01 13.40, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED] följande:
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2004, Olle Raab wrote:
>
>> But can Delphi classes be used if you are in e g TP mode ?
>
> No. You need objfpc or delphi mode for that.
Then I suggest to add this to the documentation about the language modes.
The doc says that
I would be very happy to solve the following problem, any suggestion is welcome.
I work with MS-DOS 6.2, trying to port from TP55 to Freepascal GO32.
There is a terminate stay resident program (for which I have no access to the
sources) that deals with the interface part of the application (GUI).
I
Hello,
I'd like to try using JEDI-SDL but the directions only tell how to set
up the IDE... not how to use the command line compiler under Linux.
I'm stumped on a few of them.
I condensed the following from the JEDI-SDL Yahoo Group instructions and
added what I think the corresponding command-li
26 matches
Mail list logo
