> So a computer calling an interrupt routine a million times (for microsecond
> accuracy) that does not seem like a good idea performance wise.
>
> Also calculating the control word (?) can be inaccurate (?): control_word
> := $1234DD div frequency; ( ??? what about the remainder ??? )
>
> So I
Hello,
I thought I give this newsgroup a try since you guys seem to know so much
about all this stuff :D.
Windows has a high performance counter api.
With this api one can read the tick frequency and the tick count.
Dividing the tick count by the tick frequency gives the time that has past
or a
> > > A 286 is in fact a 32 bit cpu... limited to 32 mb ram.
> >
> > No, the 286 is a 16 bit cpu with a 24 bit address bus (so it can
> > address 16MB ram, not 32MB). The width of the address bus is
> > independent of the size of the registers of a cpu.
>
> Hmm indeed I was put off by masm's tutor
- Original Message -
From: "Jonas Maebe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]Modifying cpu registers while in turbo pascal
interrupt routine ?
>
> On 20 mrt 2004, at 03:21, Harald Houppermans wrote:
>
> > I read at
> I pulled in 1.9.3 from CVS yesterday. When I recompiled some code I have
> been working on I found my program crashed when creating a socket. The
> program fails with no error. It just exits. I created a test program
> with just the socket call and it also fails the same way. Here is the
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Lloyd B. Park wrote:
> I pulled in 1.9.3 from CVS yesterday. When I recompiled some code I have
> been working on I found my program crashed when creating a socket. The
> program fails with no error. It just exits. I created a test program
> with just the socket call
On 20 mrt 2004, at 03:21, Harald Houppermans wrote:
I read at some sites, set test 8086 to zero, some other sites say set
8086
to one.
The documention of TP says: zero is for 8086, one is for 80286, and
two is
for 80386.
A 286 is in fact a 32 bit cpu... limited to 32 mb ram.
No, the 286 is a 1
I pulled in 1.9.3 from CVS yesterday. When I recompiled some code I have
been working on I found my program crashed when creating a socket. The
program fails with no error. It just exits. I created a test program
with just the socket call and it also fails the same way. Here is the
code: