Re: [fpc-pascal]Berkeley DB + FPC

2004-03-01 Thread Marco van de Voort
> > > Have any interfaces been written for BerkeleyDB (preferabl... > > > > It's distributed by default. See packages/extra/gdbm > > This links to the gnu db library. > Thanks! Are there any docs? I didn't see any :( I also might have headers for real bdb somewhere on my BSD part. ___

Re: [fpc-pascal]Berkeley DB + FPC

2004-03-01 Thread Taj Morton
Hi, > > Have any interfaces been written for BerkeleyDB (preferabl... > > It's distributed by default. See packages/extra/gdbm > This links to the gnu db library. Thanks! Are there any docs? I didn't see any :( --Taj -- Lewis's Law of Travel: The first piece of luggage out of the chute do

Re: [fpc-pascal]ansistrings

2004-03-01 Thread Peter Vreman
>> I was kind of surprised to find that >> >> s1 := 'hello'; >> s2 := 'hello'; >> writeln ( pointer(s1) = pointer(s2) ); ...writes FALSE Above returns TRUE when compiled with 1.9.x. Note: It is not garaunteed to work always. Like when s1 is assigned in unit A and s2 is assigned in unit

Re: [fpc-pascal]ansistrings

2004-03-01 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, David Emerson wrote: > Hey all, > > I've been poking around the sources and documentation for some insight into the > details of how ansistrings are implemented, and I am left with some questions. > > > It would be nice if, when comparing two ansistrings, fpc would first che

Re: [fpc-pascal]rpm install

2004-03-01 Thread David Emerson
For the record: RPM version 4.1 >Re: rpm error... The installer prompted me for a root password, and then brought up a >little box that said "calculating package dependencies". Then the box disappeared, >without any error message or indication of status. Inspection revealed that it had >not ins

[fpc-pascal]ansistrings

2004-03-01 Thread David Emerson
Hey all, I've been poking around the sources and documentation for some insight into the details of how ansistrings are implemented, and I am left with some questions. It would be nice if, when comparing two ansistrings, fpc would first check to see if these two pointers are pointing to the sa

Re: [fpc-pascal]blockread + rpm install

2004-03-01 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, David Emerson wrote: > Thanks for your help with blockread. Giving the blocksize with reset (myfile, 1) > fixed it! > > >> Incidentally, fpc 1.0.10 rpm failed to install on redhat. I struggled with it for > >> a good hour. Any tips? Does the gz work better than the rpm? >

Re: [fpc-pascal]Berkeley DB + FPC

2004-03-01 Thread Michael Van Canneyt
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Taj Morton wrote: > Hi All, > Have any interfaces been written for BerkeleyDB (preferabl... > Googled it but nothing turned up :(. > Any leads would be nice. It's distributed by default. See packages/extra/gdbm This links to the gnu db library. Michael. ___

Re: [fpc-pascal]blockread + rpm install

2004-03-01 Thread David Emerson
Thanks for your help with blockread. Giving the blocksize with reset (myfile, 1) fixed it! >> Incidentally, fpc 1.0.10 rpm failed to install on redhat. I struggled with it for a >> good hour. Any tips? Does the gz work better than the rpm? > >What error do you get ? What version of rpm do you us