On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 00:43:55 +0100 (CET)
Adam Naumowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, George Patterson wrote:
>
> > This might be a nasty hack but have you tried putting in the new
> > path right at the top of the link.res file.
>
> Well, the link.res file is created automatica
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, George Patterson wrote:
> This might be a nasty hack but have you tried putting in the new path
> right at the top of the link.res file.
Well, the link.res file is created automatically following the compiler's
config file. Normally, there should be no need to change link.res
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003 23:46:18 +0100 (CET)
Adam Naumowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to strictly define the paths where FPC looks for
> objects and libraries?
>
> AFAIK -Fl can only add a new value, not override the old one. I'm
> trying to compile with solaris target on
Hello,
Is there a way to strictly define the paths where FPC looks for objects
and libraries?
AFAIK -Fl can only add a new value, not override the old one. I'm trying
to compile with solaris target on a linux machine, so I need to tell FPC
to use solaris libc.a, crti.o, and crtn.o instead of thos
Hi!
A friend of me has hot OS-X for his mac. He needs to set UMASK to 000 as
default, currently it is 022.
But OS-X seems to have this hidden somewhere, it is different. Can somebody
help, please?
mfg
Ing. Rainer Hantsch
--
.-
> 1.00.10 for linux.
> Oh, thanks. And don't you know how to do the same thing (direct access to
> video ram) under linux ?
Modern operating systems don't allow that. Sometimes it can be emulated
with a virtual screen (see unit video that does that)
