Hi,
I'm trying to compile the gtk2 interface for lazarus with fpc 1.0.10, but
ran into a nasty little problem: fpc runs amok. For example it compiles the
first 600 hundred lines of gtkproc.inc (a lazarus include file) and then it
allocates mem, and allocates, and allocates, and allocates, ..., til
In reply to your message of August 28, 2003
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, L D Blake wrote:
>> Why is it that if I compile an FPC program with range checking turned on,
>> opening any HTML file in ie immediately causes "Error 201" from my FPC program?
> Ahem.
> A litlle bit more information may be in or
The F_SETLK constant is set at 6 on BSD systems... while 6 is correct for Linux
systems, F_SETLK is 8 on BSD systems... I assume this means that F_SETOWN etc.
are wrote too for fcntl constants on BSD systems.
Just to let you know. :-)
___
fpc-pascal ma
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, L D Blake wrote:
> Why is it that if I compile an FPC program with range checking turned on,
> opening any HTML file in ie immediately causes "Error 201" from my FPC program?
Ahem.
A litlle bit more information may be in order here ?
What kind of program is this ? What unit
Why is it that if I compile an FPC program with range checking turned on,
opening any HTML file in ie immediately causes "Error 201" from my FPC program?
---
L D Blake
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/li
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:09:12PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> Synapse. It's on the contributed units list, I think.
If I remember correctly, this is what you guys had a huge mailing list
conversation about :P God knows what about though I couldn't follow it
after 2 follow ups :(
cheers
Ja
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:51:41PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >
> > into the main distribution over time.
> >
> > Currently FPC compiles the few console demoes (http, smtp, ftp and generic
> > socket), and the units that belong to that (and a few more without demoes)
> >
> > To use ICS
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:08:44PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > The www.lazarus.freepascal.org has been down for a while, does anyone know
> > what exactly what happened?
>
> Some hacker activity, and the owner wanted to reinstall to make sure that
> they were entirely gone.
That's so pat
Thanks for answering.
I am finishing downloading it, but I have some time to wait yet (56k and
only a few hours per weekend). How is the project going?
[]'s
Renato Borges A. Prado
VW Gol Power 1.0 16V 02/02
Poá-SP
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Van Canneyt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
> The www.lazarus.freepascal.org has been down for a while, does anyone know
> what exactly what happened?
Some hacker activity, and the owner wanted to reinstall to make sure that
they were entirely gone.
He took the oppurtunity to add new hardware, and that all took more time
then expected. Pro
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:51:41PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
> >
> > After years of playing to get ICS running under FPC/win32, the 1.1.x
> > compiler is finally getting so stable that the only remaining differences
> > are minor ones. So minor, t
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Renato Borges A. Prado wrote:
> The www.lazarus.freepascal.org has been down for a while, does anyone know
> what exactly what happened?
A hacker attacked it. Michael Hess is working on it.
Michael.
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:51:41PM +0200, Marco van de Voort wrote:
>
> After years of playing to get ICS running under FPC/win32, the 1.1.x
> compiler is finally getting so stable that the only remaining differences
> are minor ones. So minor, that the author of ICS has decided to merge them
> in
The www.lazarus.freepascal.org has been down for a while, does anyone know
what exactly what happened?
[]'s
Renato
- Original Message -
From: "Marco van de Voort" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [fpc-pascal]2 questions on a
After years of playing to get ICS running under FPC/win32, the 1.1.x
compiler is finally getting so stable that the only remaining differences
are minor ones. So minor, that the author of ICS has decided to merge them
into the main distribution over time.
Currently FPC compiles the few console de
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 09:31:13AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> In D7, yes. In FPC: Not unless you send me a patch :-)
Perhaps I will. It's rather a waste of code to create an entire
desandant :)
cheers
James
--
-
-Zero Defect Software Engineers Group - ZDSEG
-
-You need only two t
> >
> > yielding s = 'abcdelmnop'
> >
> > ...does the system "shift" the 'lmnop' to the left, or does the string
> > get hooked together with pointers, thus saving much time with long strings?
>
> No shifting, ansistrings are not sparse (at least not in this implementation.
should be:
It does
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:39:10AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mil
> 1. If a segment is deleted from an ansistring, e.g. ...
>
> s := 'abcdefghijklmnop';
> delete (s, 5, 6);
>
> yielding s = 'abcdelmnop'
>
> ...does the system "shift" the 'lmnop' to the left, or does the string
> get hooked together with pointers, thus saving much time with long strings?
No sh
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 03:03:31PM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:39:10AM +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, James Mills wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Is TStringList
20 matches
Mail list logo
