On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:16:50PM -0800, Mark Emerson wrote:
> Marco van de Voort wrote:
> > Yes, I think Carl did a good job there.
>
> Wellnot only Carl...I think you ALL (on the FPC team) are doing an
> EXCELLENT job. I'm exceedingly grateful to have this compiler, and, as
> a bonus, to a
At 12:16 PM 2/11/2003 -0800, you wrote:
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Yes, I think Carl did a good job there.
Wellnot only Carl...I think you ALL (on the FPC team) are doing an
EXCELLENT job. I'm exceedingly grateful to have this compiler, and, as
a bonus, to also have access to communicate wi
Hello, John!
> can also contribute eg a (non OO) FP test unit? if you like. Any ideas
> about how to define the 'features' to be tested? Regards John
***
procedure define;
begin
lock; // (?)
brainstorm;
..
***
well, my first contribution to a brainstorming of features to be tested is -
*
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 15:24, you wrote:
> I suggest you check out the tests; it does all you describe.
ok.
> In no particular order:
i long to be a member of the free pascal development team. comments are
welcome. are there any rites involved, such as programming a 4d-visualization
of t
Marco van de Voort wrote:
> Yes, I think Carl did a good job there.
Wellnot only Carl...I think you ALL (on the FPC team) are doing an
EXCELLENT job. I'm exceedingly grateful to have this compiler, and, as
a bonus, to also have access to communicate with its developers (that
was impossible wi
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> >
> > On dinsdag, feb 11, 2003, at 15:39 Europe/Brussels, Anton Tichawa wrote:
> >
> > > What about a standard test application that uses every feature of Free
> > > Pascal,
> >
> > Do you want to write that? :)
> >
> > > compares it's own results to s
Before you go and write one, DUnit might fit that bill. I think it's on
sourceforge, but will also be somewhere in the JEDI pages too.
We just *need* a complete VCL drop in to use it 'as is', but it could be
used as a basis for FPCUnit though, I guess. Or at least TPUnit.
> What about a standard
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Anton Tichawa wrote:
> Hello!
>
> > If you keep it runnnable on windoze and go32v2, I'll help you to test it. I
>
> Well, the test program I think of needs to:
>
> 1. create pascal sources and configuration files & write them to disk
>
> 2. start the compiler and review it's
Hello!
> If you keep it runnnable on windoze and go32v2, I'll help you to test it. I
Well, the test program I think of needs to:
1. create pascal sources and configuration files & write them to disk
2. start the compiler and review it's console output
3. start the created application
4. check
If you keep it runnnable on windoze and go32v2, I'll help you to test it. I
can also contribute eg a (non OO) FP test unit? if you like. Any ideas about
how to define the 'features' to be tested? Regards John
-Original Message-
Hello, List!
> Do you want to write that? :)
If nobody els
On dinsdag, feb 11, 2003, at 14:06 Europe/Brussels, Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
We have a test suite, with about 1000 test programs, which test every
aspect of the compiler.
Make that "most aspects" :)
Jonas
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTE
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Jonas Maebe wrote:
>
> On dinsdag, feb 11, 2003, at 15:39 Europe/Brussels, Anton Tichawa wrote:
>
> > What about a standard test application that uses every feature of Free
> > Pascal,
>
> Do you want to write that? :)
>
> > compares it's own results to standard results and
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Anton Tichawa wrote:
> Hello, List!
>
> > Not really, but it's simply a possibility to introduce bugs into code
> > that works correctly. The gain is not really worth it at this time imho.
>
> What about a standard test application that uses every feature of Free
> Pascal, c
Hello, List!
> Do you want to write that? :)
If nobody else does, I do. But I'd prefer doing it for linux only.
Anton.
--
"Adas Methode war, wie sich zeigen wird, Tagträume in offenbar korrekte
Berechnungen einzuweben."
Doris Langley Moore: Ada, Countess of Lovelace (London 1977).
On dinsdag, feb 11, 2003, at 15:39 Europe/Brussels, Anton Tichawa wrote:
What about a standard test application that uses every feature of Free
Pascal,
Do you want to write that? :)
compares it's own results to standard results and produces a list of
newly introduced bugs?
We already have
Hello, List!
> Not really, but it's simply a possibility to introduce bugs into code
> that works correctly. The gain is not really worth it at this time imho.
What about a standard test application that uses every feature of Free
Pascal, compares it's own results to standard results and produce
On dinsdag, feb 11, 2003, at 14:56 Europe/Brussels, Anton Tichawa wrote:
It's possible to make range checks inline, but at a first glance it
seems to
me that this would require reworking of very old (legacy?) parts of the
compiler.
Not really, but it's simply a possibility to introduce bugs in
Hello, List!
> > Regarding Performance: range checks and especially the array
> > access etc. could be inlined, saving an indirect call for every access.
> > [Don't know the FPC implementation].
>
> Accesses are inlined, range checks are not.
It's possible to make range checks inline, but at a fi
I've revised isprime(), now it is a bit faster. The new version embedded
in a small unit can be found at:
http://www.polarhome.com/~franco/isprime.pas
Franco
___
fpc-pascal maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-
On maandag, feb 10, 2003, at 18:37 Europe/Brussels, Thomas Schatzl
wrote:
Regarding Performance: range checks and especially the array
access etc. could be inlined, saving an indirect call for every access.
[Don't know the FPC implementation].
Accesses are inlined, range checks are not.
Jona
Hello, James!
You have to allocate memory BEFORE storing data there, i. e. you should
change datanick.pas lines about 63 .. 66 from:
nicks[nNicks] := TNick.init(nick, hops, signon, ident, host,
server, unused, name);
{getMem(nicks, sizeOf(TNick) * nNicks);}
inc(nNicks);
reAllocMem(ni
21 matches
Mail list logo
