I'm not sure if this is a TDbf issue, or an FPC db issue, so I'm posting
both places. I'm using CVS of FPC from about 1 hour ago.
Basically, whatever I do, if I try to set the "IndexName" or
"IndexFieldNames" property of the TDbf I get an access violation.
Here's a sample:
var
MyDbf: TDbf;
b
Tony Maro wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a TDbf issue, or an FPC db issue, so I'm
posting both places. I'm using CVS of FPC from about 1 hour ago.
Basically, whatever I do, if I try to set the "IndexName" or
"IndexFieldNames" property of the TDbf I get an
ndler, it results in "Operation cannot be performed on an inactive
dataset."
Wouldn't the dataset already be open to trigger an OnDataChanged?
-Tony Maro
___
fpc-devel maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
Since it's an FPC constant, I can't easily change this.
Basically, this makes every date format function useless for me.
I see a note above it that says use InitInternational to set this, but
that procedure seems to do nothing of the sort.
Can we not change all the defines in sysint
Marco van de Voort wrote:
The DateSeparator is defined in sysinth.inc as
Const
{ Character to be put between date, month and year }
DateSeparator: char = '-';
As said on IRC, I suspect this is a 1.0.10 issue. (1.9.x bootstrapping with 1.0.x I
mean), since IIRC 1.0.x doesn't support
Right, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you can see it is a typed const, which means you can set it to any
character you like. To solve your problems, set it to '/' at program startup,
and you should be fine.
Same for the other constants.
Ah... okay. So just a lack of knowledge on my part.
Thanks guys,
T
I just updated my FPC cvs today.
My last update was 3 or 4 days ago.
I haven't updated Lazarus in a week or so.
The latest FPC update breaks building Lazarus from inside the IDE. For
those familiar, if you try to install a package, Lazarus will optionally
rebuild itself. Now it will either free
Treeve Jelbert wrote:
I tried the latest source tarball of lazarus and did 'make' as instructed.
everything compiles ok
then I did 'make install PREFIX=/usr/share/lazarus'
Wrong list - try the lazarus list.
However, Lazarus needs no install. Just a "make" will do it for you.
In fact I don't t
]: *** [alllclunits.ppu] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tony/lazarus/lcl'
make: *** [lcl] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lazarus]$
Happens on an older Lazarus as well, so I assume it's an FPC issue.
-Tony Maro
___
fpc-devel maillist
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 7 nov 2004, at 20:45, Tony Maro wrote:
system.pp(31,1) Fatal: Internal error 200309141
make[1]: *** [alllclunits.ppu] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/tony/lazarus/lcl'
make: *** [lcl] Error 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lazarus]$
Happens on an older Lazarus as well,
can't expect to run FPC 1.9.x on it within
any reasonable timeframe (or ever)?
Yes, I know it's initial stages right now, but a long term goal for this
project is to compile a Lazarus applictation for Mac - 1 year / 1.5
years away has been discussed
Th
Vincent Snijders wrote:
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
I guess the bigger problem is to get a native (carbon based) lazarus
running :)
Maybe Tony can ask for some development Macs for the lazarus team too.
;-)
Vincent.
Uh... sure!
Thanks for the responses guys. It'll be fun to A) learn how to turn o
F7A5
$08048278
[EMAIL PROTECTED] fpc]$
--
Thanks,
Tony Maro
Check out CheckBook Tracker, a free personal finance software for Linux!
http://tony.maro.net
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/m
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 12:29 +0200, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2005, DrDiettrich wrote:
>
> > A friend of mine just has tested my archiver, with the following results
> > for an TAR with a million of files:
> >
> > PowerArchiver: 530 minutes.
> > My Unarch: 160 minutes.
>
> Hu
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 21:56 +0400, Alexey Barkovoy wrote:
> > But you're the only one to report problems, which suggests the problem is
> > somewhere on your side. Maybe a proxy ?
>
> Well I'm having problems with www.freepascal.org for around a month now
> (maybe
> even more). Sometimes it's j
> Well, he does not say anything about the project specifically, just that
> Borland is committed to Delphi, surprise, surprise :-)
>
> Micha
Actually, when asked if Lazarus, FPC, etc are competitors to Delphi he says:
"I think they're just other languages or other projects for people to take a
he cell
back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will let the change save
(and I'm not sure why it's not consistent.) I'm assuming this might be
related to the recent db subsystem changes?
Can someone confirm the date issue for me?
Thanks,
Tony Maro
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote:
Can someone confirm the date issue for me?
I can't confirm it, but I do want to mention that I fixed all
datetime-related routines for *nix platforms in sysutils a while ago.
They operated based on the supposition tha
Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 21 jul 2005, at 00:40, Tony Maro wrote:
Can someone confirm the date issue for me?
I can't confirm it, but I do want to mention that I fixed all
datetime-related routines for *nix platforms in sysutils a while ago.
They operated based on the supposition tha
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I've also noticed that the TDBGrid component in Lazarus no longer allows
reliable editing of the data. Most of the time it just reverts the cell
back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will let the change save
(and I'm not sure why it's not consistent.) I'm a
Tony Maro wrote:
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I've also noticed that the TDBGrid component in Lazarus no longer
allows reliable editing of the data. Most of the time it just
reverts the cell back to it's previous value, but sometimes it will
let the change save (and I'm not su
argument index in format ""
Should I put this in the bugtracker, or is it just me?
Thanks,
-Tony Maro
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
fine as does the first writeln.
Should I add this to the bugtracker, or is it just me?
-Tony Maro
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
I just tried to use FindFirst to get a listing of files in a directory.
I passed FindFirst the following:
if FindFirst('/home/tony/test/*',faAnyFile, Res) < 0 then begin
It never would return any results. Then I noticed that FindFirst calls:
GlobSearchRec^.Path:=ExpandFileName(ExtractFile
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Tony Maro wrote:
I just tried to use FindFirst to get a listing of files in a directory. I
passed FindFirst the following:
if FindFirst('/home/tony/test/*',faAnyFile, Res) < 0 then begin
It never would return any results. T
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
This is a snapshot compiler, please use the official compiler if you can.
If you use snapshots, use only the latest possible. The development compiler
is not guaranteed bug free, as you can see. The current development compiler
has no problem with your code, so that
Alexander Todorov wrote:
Hello word
I did :
ShowMessage(Document.FindNode('message').NodeValue)
but it returns an empty string. Showing NodeName returns 'message'.
How to get the contents of the tag Is it working ?
The real problem is that the computer recognized that it i
Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> im trying to use sockets in a unit which should work on linux and win32.
>
> I use the sockets unit, but for things like SOL_SOCKET, TTimeval (for
> setsockopt), SO_RCVTIMEO, fpgeterrno
> I finally had to use unix,unixtype,baseunix. This on Linux.
>
> Now I try t
ownload the installer from the USA mirror at http://lazarus.maro.net/
-Tony Maro
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
I'm trying to implement a deamon using and example I found at:
ftp://ftp.cncware.com/pub/fpc/daemon.pp
I've of course had to make several changes to support a more recent
compiler, mostly adding fp in front of some of the methods.
Everything compiles fine, and the process forks and dumps directly
I use the Synapse TCP toolkit. I recently updated to 2.0.2 (can't get a
full working 2.0.3 in Windows yet for some reason) and found that
Synapse suddenly didn't compile in Linux.
Now, it's likely that the Synapse toolkit has already been updated, but
my point is the difference now between Linux
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
>
>
> AFAIK this has been fixed in the Synapse toolkit.
> It has been changed to use the agnostic TLibHandle type.
>
Okay, thanks. I just thought it was odd that it worked the same for
both and then in a later FPC it didn't.
One day I must update my synapse toolk
32 matches
Mail list logo
