Since I'm working on generics right now can we finally, at the very least,
allow class operators for comparison operators? This is literally the only way
for a generic class to override the = operator (along with some others) so
there's no reason not to allow this. I understand the objection to
On 2021-04-17 22:02, Ryan Joseph via fpc-devel wrote:
Since I'm working on generics right now can we finally, at the very
least, allow class operators for comparison operators? This is
literally the only way for a generic class to override the = operator
(along with some others) so there's no rea
> On Apr 17, 2021, at 2:12 PM, Jonas Maebe via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> The issue with allowing it for classes (generic or not) is that the the =
> operator already has a meaning for them (pointer equality). I think in
> general we don't allow overloading operators that have a built-in meaning
Is there any interest in porting FPC to Freebsd/PowerPC64?
I'm looking for some help with port FPC to FreeBSD on PowerPC. Any
assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
https://lists.fr
