> On Apr 14, 2021, at 11:39 PM, Sven Barth wrote:
>
> Well, then I'll have to improve the check. But for now you can continue,
> right?
I can continue but if I include the check some tests will fail. Currently I've
only made some changes in create_unamed_typesym and now this check to reject
> On Apr 14, 2021, at 3:49 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote:
>
> It works but it thinks this array is array of const also so it's too strict I
> believe.
>
> ['aaa', 'bbb'];
About this, shouldn't we just be doing this? Any array constructor that has
elements which are which are incompatible is "array
