Am 16.03.2019 um 01:14 schrieb J. Gareth Moreton:
Hi everyone,
This might be a painfully basic question, but I'm just trying to get
to grips with the difference between Lazarus packages and FPC
packages. How do FPC packages work normally and what's their relation
to Lazarus packages?
I ask
Op 2019-03-16 om 09:38 schreef Sven Barth via fpc-devel:
This might be a painfully basic question, but I'm just trying to get
to grips with the difference between Lazarus packages and FPC
packages. How do FPC packages work normally and what's their
relation to Lazarus packages?
I ask beca
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:51 PM Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
> What you could do is
>
> TUniCodestringArray = Array of UniCodeString;
>
> Function GetKeyNames : TUniCodestringArray;
> Function GetValueNames : TUniCodestringArray;
>
> The TStringList versions can call these and do the conversion.
I
On Sat, 16 Mar 2019, Bart wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 6:51 PM Michael Van Canneyt
wrote:
What you could do is
TUniCodestringArray = Array of UniCodeString;
Function GetKeyNames : TUniCodestringArray;
Function GetValueNames : TUniCodestringArray;
The TStringList versions can call these
> On Mar 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Sven Barth via fpc-devel
> wrote:
>
> That could maybe be managed once the support for constants as parameter for
> generics is added (note: I don't know right now how SHUFPS works, so take the
> following as pseudo code):
>
I fixed the patch for constants in
Normally Florian or another administrator will say if the patch has been
applied and mark the ticket as "resolved" if they're happy. Once they are
added I will have a play around.
Admittedly one thing I'm also waiting on is the node XML dump feature (
https://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=350
Of course, my worry now is that we've submitted so many patches and issues
that we'll just be building an ever-growing back-log that may never be
cleared. It also depends on what Florian's own vision for the future of
Free Pascal is, I think.
Gareth aka. Kit
On Sat 16/03/19 17:05 , "J. Gareth
Inlining of pure assembler functions would actually be immediately,
specifically useful to me! I've been having a go at improving FPC scores on
"BenchmarksGames", and was so far successful with Binary Trees simple by
throwing a really good threading library at it, however, there are some
benchmarks
Thank you so much Ben! I'm glad I'm not the only person who gets a kick
out of assembly language programming! There's still a place for it even
in today's world.
I myself have a passion for games development, and it was partly my
driving force behind implementing "vectorcall" for FPC, something
> On Mar 16, 2019, at 9:54 PM, Ben Grasset wrote:
>
> Inlining of pure assembler functions would actually be immediately,
> specifically useful to me! I've been having a go at improving FPC scores on
> "BenchmarksGames", and was so far successful with Binary Trees simple by
> throwing a real
Hi Ryan,
I haven't forgotten about "pure" functions - that's still definitely an
area of research for me. I got myself a little bit lost because I'm still
trying to work out a solid design plan (for major changes to FPC, I now
write a full specification, which are the PDF files I've attached to
11 matches
Mail list logo
