2009/10/16 JoshyFun :
>
> I think it has been designed to avoid derived classes from commercial
> packages.
In that case, it just plain dumb! I don't know of a single commercial
package that doesn't benefit from extensions by external developers.
* Microsoft Shell (thousands)
* OS/2 Workplace Sh
Hello Graeme,
Friday, October 16, 2009, 11:01:42 PM, you wrote:
GG> Would you mind explaining this - I never saw the benefit of a sealed
GG> class. Using myself as an example. Say I develop some kick-ass OOP
GG> framework. There is no way in hell I can forsee every possible use of
GG> the classes
