On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 08:37 +0100, Micha Nelissen wrote:
> Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> > I had some plans to write a new sqldb-connection based on lNet. That's
> > became difficult now.
>
> The solution is to pull sqldb out also, not to push lNet in ;-).
The new connection could also become part
I think that networking components should be all included ...
... however, we all know that the project is still young and there is a
lot of road ahead ... (first of all there is still the package installer
to fix)
So if that's done for compatibility-stability problems, it's a temporary
choi
Joost van der Sluis wrote:
I had some plans to write a new sqldb-connection based on lNet. That's
became difficult now.
The solution is to pull sqldb out also, not to push lNet in ;-).
Micha
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
h
On Št, 2007-01-04 at 23:15 +0100, Joost van der Sluis wrote:
> I don't know if I'm really happy with this. lNet was a usefull addition
> to the fcl. Now the fcl doesn't have any tcp/ip-components.
>
> I had some plans to write a new sqldb-connection based on lNet. That's
> became difficult now.
I
I don't know if I'm really happy with this. lNet was a usefull addition
to the fcl. Now the fcl doesn't have any tcp/ip-components.
I had some plans to write a new sqldb-connection based on lNet. That's
became difficult now.
About the slow release cycle, that's not only a problem with lNet, but
a
