[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
Quoting Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
C Western schreef:
ð£ÔÒ ëÏÓÁÒÅ×ÓËÉÊ wrote:
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed
integers. Why not for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is
Delphi-l
Quoting Vincent Snijders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> C Western schreef:
> > ð£ÔÒ ëÏÓÁÒÅ×ÓËÉÊ wrote:
> >>> In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed
> >>> integers. Why not for DWORD and QWORD?
> >>
> >> I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is
> >> Delphi
C Western schreef:
Пётр Косаревский wrote:
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed
integers. Why not for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is
Delphi-like).
And it can be tricky to distinguish signed and unsigned expression
Пётр Косаревский wrote:
In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed integers. Why not
for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is Delphi-like).
And it can be tricky to distinguish signed and unsigned expression values.
Like,
a:
> In the math unit are the CompareValue functions only for signed integers. Why
> not
> for DWORD and QWORD?
I guess, that it's Delphi mimicing implementation (because it is Delphi-like).
And it can be tricky to distinguish signed and unsigned expression values.
Like,
a: qword;
a-1 --- ??? (
