mail),
I can look at it.
Darek
- Original Message -
From: "Lee, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 1:12 PM
Subject: RE: [fpc-devel]improve makefile
> Darek, these are the make scripts that I have trouble with under win95 a
From: Darek Mazur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 January 2004 20:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel]improve makefile
I have:
C:/PP/BIN/WIN32/MAKE.EXE -C compiler distinstall
MAKE.EXE[5]: Entering directory `C:/pp/source/compiler'
C:/PP/BIN/WIN32/MAKE.EXE -C utils install
MAKE.
ED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: RE: [fpc-devel]improve makefile
> I agree with you. make cycle works ok for me for go32v2 and win32 on win95
> and winme and I'd guess for win98 too, but the full make go32v2zip and
> win32zip don't! I've sent the l
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: [fpc-devel]improve makefile
> At 19:17 15-1-2004, you wrote:
> >Hi
> > From several days I've try to make all fpc myself, but to do this under
> >WIN98 is not so clear that it can be.
> >
I agree with you. make cycle works ok for me for go32v2 and win32 on win95
and winme and I'd guess for win98 too, but the full make go32v2zip and
win32zip don't! I've sent the logs to core but... Apparently the problem is
with redirection? I was told that they'd work on win98- but it sounds as if
At 19:17 15-1-2004, you wrote:
Hi
From several days I've try to make all fpc myself, but to do this under
WIN98 is not so clear that it can be.
I've found some bugs in makefile, and somebody may change FPCM to be
generated proper MAKEFILE
What is proper? Windows is so broken for command line suppor
Hi
>From several days I've try to make all fpc myself, but to do this under
WIN98 is not so clear that it can be.
I've found some bugs in makefile, and somebody may change FPCM to be
generated proper MAKEFILE
my 4 suggestion:
1
/* current MAKEFILE
ifdef PWD
BASEDIR:=$(subst \,/,$(
