On Wed, 25 Jun 2025, Mattias Gaertner via fpc-devel wrote:
On 6/25/25 08:42, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
If I'm right in thinking, things like "fpc_abs_real" are fallback
functions that have to be overridden by a platform-specific
implementation, and return runtime errors if the
On 6/25/25 08:42, J. Gareth Moreton via fpc-devel wrote:
If I'm right in thinking, things like "fpc_abs_real" are fallback
functions that have to be overridden by a platform-specific
implementation, and return runtime errors if they aren't implemented. In
many cases, such internal compiler ro
If I'm right in thinking, things like "fpc_abs_real" are fallback
functions that have to be overridden by a platform-specific
implementation, and return runtime errors if they aren't implemented.
In many cases, such internal compiler routines are not called at all
because there's a direct inst
Hi,
How do the fpc_ compileprocs in the rtl like fpc_abs_real work?
Some platforms have assembler code, others just raises an error.
They are included by a comment:
{ documenting compiler proc. is useless, they shouldn't be used by the
user anyways }
{$ifndef fpdocsystem}
{$i compproc.inc}
