In our previous episode, Seth Grover said:
> I have provided a patch.
>
> http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18617
Committed with only marginal changes.
___
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/mailman/li
I have provided a patch.
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=18617
-SG
--
This email is fiction. Any resemblance to actual events
or persons living or dead is purely coincidental.
Seth Grover
sethdgrover[at]gmail[dot]com
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Marco said:
> It is not in all flavours, and many BSDs can turn it off.
> But that is more theoretical. The more practical problem is that while /proc
> might usually exist, its contents and permissions vary. (and that also goes
> for Linux, specially on embedded variants)
> If this really is an h
In our previous episode, Seth Grover said:
> >
> > Michael.
> >
>
> My current thought is to use FindFirst/FindNext in the context of the
> child process after the fork but before the exec to enumerate the
> contents of /proc/[pid]/fd/ and close all the descriptors greater than
> 2. I don't have e
>> I'm contemplating patching TProcess so that if FInheritHandles
>> is false (default is true) it would do this.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> By all means, go ahead. I didn't know there was a way to enumerate all file
> descriptors.
>
> Michael.
>
My current thought is to use FindFirst/FindNext in the con
