Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho schrieb:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
>> This is great news for me, as I am considering a NIOS2 Port and NIOS2 is
>> very similar to MIPS32 so we might be able to work together on this and
>> the resulting thingy would support both architect
> R01 used by Assembler for optimization (don't use)
> R02 Function Return Value (least significant 32 Bits) (Not used by
> Compiler)
Sorry, Typo: Of course R01 is the one that is not used by the compiler.
-Michael
___
fpc-devel maillist -
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
>
> What operating system will you be targetting?
Linux
>
> I think that telling FPC which ASM instructions to use should be quite
> easy, the main problem should be getting a grip in the binutils, how
> to link libraries and all other stuff that comes with it
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/fpc-mips/develop
AFAIK, this only contains some initial steps that someone tool ages ago
and did not proceed.
>
> Maybe this work could be ported to the latest trunk.
I have no hope regarding this and suppose to do code for
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
> This is great news for me, as I am considering a NIOS2 Port and NIOS2 is
> very similar to MIPS32 so we might be able to work together on this and
> the resulting thingy would support both architectures.
What operating system will you be t
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Michael Schnell wrote:
> This is great news for me, as I am considering a NIOS2 Port and NIOS2 is
> very similar to MIPS32 so we might be able to work together on this and
> the resulting thingy would support both architectures.
I already have 2 news about this.
Here another quote from the said thread:
---
Florian Klaempfl wrote:
Another backend for FPC is 4k-5k lines (pascal, no need to
learn C), just make it a bounty for say 2000 Eur and I'am sure, somebody
will write you a backend for the desired processor.
On 18 Nov 2009, at 11:40, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
How would one proceed to port Free Pascal to a new architecture? Any
initial steps?
Start from an initial backend that is most similar to your cpu. E.g.,
probably ARM or SPARC in your case. Then modify the code.
I haven't found
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> How would one proceed to port Free Pascal to a new architecture? Any
> initial steps? I haven't found anything about this.
Please take a look at the backlog of this mailing list. It has been
discussed just recently in the "LLVM Backend?" thread and also was
dis
Hello,
How would one proceed to port Free Pascal to a new architecture? Any
initial steps? I haven't found anything about this.
I am considering a MIPS port (to target linux-mips). But don't count
on it, not sure at the moment if it will be successfull.
thanks,
--
Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho
__
10 matches
Mail list logo
